10 September 2004
- 00:0200:02, 10 September 2004 diff hist +120 Trust references current
9 September 2004
- 23:0223:02, 9 September 2004 diff hist +1,159 Libel by Wikimedia time to start looking for lawyers, these suits are inevitable, and CGO might as well profit from them current
- 22:5522:55, 9 September 2004 diff hist +35 Libel against Wikimedia many have done current
- 22:5322:53, 9 September 2004 diff hist +240 N Talk:Libel by Wikimedia asking opinions current
- 22:5222:52, 9 September 2004 diff hist +159 N Libel suit No edit summary current
- 22:5122:51, 9 September 2004 diff hist +1,606 N Libel by Wikimedia more law
- 22:4222:42, 9 September 2004 diff hist +1,400 Libel against Wikimedia you want to talk law? here's the REAL law
- 22:3522:35, 9 September 2004 diff hist +343 Identity dispute No edit summary
- 22:3322:33, 9 September 2004 diff hist +66 N Talk:Identity dispute why discuss the law or principles with people who have so few principles they cannot even spell the word properly? ("principal"? LOL) current
- 22:3222:32, 9 September 2004 diff hist +702 Identity dispute this "principal" (you moron) does not apply, immediate pursuit is about body relations in physical circumstances; besides which the assumptions made that way are still nothing but allegations
- 22:0022:00, 9 September 2004 diff hist +233 Authoritarianism No edit summary current
- 21:5821:58, 9 September 2004 diff hist +41 N Alleged faction #REDIRECT Talk:Wikipedia (142 trolls); this is the only alleged faction or conspiracy we are presently discussing, though Wikimedia's sysop power structure may be another example current
- 21:5721:57, 9 September 2004 diff hist +666 Talk:Wikipedia (142 trolls) No edit summary current
- 21:5421:54, 9 September 2004 diff hist +783 N Wikipedia (by Richard Chilton) No edit summary current
- 21:5421:54, 9 September 2004 diff hist −739 Wikipedia (Richard Chilton) #REDIRECT Wikipedia (by Richard Chilton); this is an author who claims his own attribution, not a faction, so "by" applies current
- 21:5221:52, 9 September 2004 diff hist +3 Talk:Research:claim corruption ok it'll only be worse to do later, applying attribution standard ... (by Richard Chilton) current
- 21:5021:50, 9 September 2004 diff hist +553 N Talk:Research:claim corruption No edit summary
- 21:4721:47, 9 September 2004 diff hist +150 N Research:claim corruption suggest standard: "claim corruption" is a verb phrase describing what a user might want to do in one click as a command verb, but claims of corruption is a noun phrase for the result current
- 21:4321:43, 9 September 2004 diff hist +61 Talk:Wikipedia (142 trolls) eg
- 21:4121:41, 9 September 2004 diff hist +216 N Talk:Wikipedia (142 trolls) naming convention suggested: Wikipedia (by 142 trolls)
- 21:3821:38, 9 September 2004 diff hist +501 Talk:Wikipedia No edit summary
- 21:3521:35, 9 September 2004 diff hist +13,854 N Wikipedia (142 trolls) moved current
- 21:3521:35, 9 September 2004 diff hist −13,818 Wikipedia (from 142 perspective) "from" and "perspective" are redundant - moving to Wikipedia (142 trolls) to name article after commenting faction current
- 21:3221:32, 9 September 2004 diff hist +130 Wikipedia No edit summary
- 21:2821:28, 9 September 2004 diff hist +1,050 N Central control No edit summary current
- 21:2421:24, 9 September 2004 diff hist +607 N Authoritarianism No edit summary
- 21:2121:21, 9 September 2004 diff hist +558 N User-owned, user-run, user-controlled No edit summary current
- 21:1921:19, 9 September 2004 diff hist 0 Wikipedia (Richard Chilton) No edit summary
- 21:1821:18, 9 September 2004 diff hist +783 N Wikipedia (Richard Chilton) No edit summary
- 21:1021:10, 9 September 2004 diff hist +190 English Wikipedia User Richardchilton this excerpt could be titled Wikipedia (Richard Chilton) and is another perspective that should be integrated into Wikipedia (Reds) - the more Reds that explain the truth the better
- 20:3320:33, 9 September 2004 diff hist +64 Talk:Independent board avoid virtual community fanatics lusting to apply the police metaphor
- 20:3220:32, 9 September 2004 diff hist +1,886 Talk:Independent board candidates?