Guidelines for claiming corruption cases in Research Wiki: Difference between revisions
Guidelines for claiming corruption cases in Research Wiki (edit)
Revision as of 16:58, 9 September 2004
, 9 September 2004why these "guidelines" are worthless: constant sysop vandalism of any attempt to document the claims or any background material that supports arguments that this is bad for GFDL corpus
(initial guidelines for registering corruption cases in research wiki pilot) |
(why these "guidelines" are worthless: constant sysop vandalism of any attempt to document the claims or any background material that supports arguments that this is bad for GFDL corpus) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Claims of corruption are | Claims of corruption are trivialized and hidden from view in the following way: | ||
in the article [[Claims of corruption]] or [[COC]] | 1. Constant [[sysop vandalism]] of any attempt to document claims that anger [[Wikimedia]], which will be labelled "false" or "unsubstantiated" even with prima facie evidence. Censorship of any background material that supports arguments that this is bad for [[GFDL corpus]], or that there is in fact any such corpus other than [[Wikipedia]]. | ||
2. Making a list of what to attack in the article [[Claims of corruption]] or [[COC]] | |||
*Claim: [[Party]] ([[company]], [[organisation]], [[country]], [[official]] or [[institution]]): General description of corruption claimed (name of the claim). | *Claim: [[Party]] ([[company]], [[organisation]], [[country]], [[official]] or [[institution]]): General description of corruption claimed (name of the claim). | ||
| Line 12: | Line 14: | ||
*It is recomendable to use [[TIPAESA]] structure in filing the claims | *It is recomendable to use [[TIPAESA]] structure in filing the claims | ||
*False and Unsubstantiated claims are moved to [[False or unsubstantiated claims of corruption]] | 3. For purposes of knuckling under to [[libel chill]] by [[GodKing]]s and so on: | ||
*False and Unsubstantiated claims are moved to [[False or unsubstantiated claims of corruption]] ([[FUCOC]]) where they are stated as being either [[False claim]] (proof required) or [[Unsubstantiated claim]] (showing that there is no fact(s) to substantiate the claim is enough of proof) Also a date is required when they were moved from [[COC]] to [[FUCOC]] | |||
::If you want this, it's up to YOU to dig through the page histories, logs and deleted pages (notably those about people like [[Erik Moeller]]) to find the exact specific [[Wikipedia mailing list]] quotes that back up all the claims. | |||
Please refrain from stating corruption cases in the [[Development Wiki]] for the legal threat posed by such claims takes up our efforts and time which would be much better spent on solving the practical issues. | Please refrain from stating corruption cases in the [[Development Wiki]] for the legal threat posed by such claims takes up our efforts and time which would be much better spent on solving the practical issues. | ||
::The most practical issue is the disappearance of essential articles like [[w:Genuine Progress Indicator]] and such due to [[sysop vandalism]] of the [[GFDL corpus]]. This is turn is caused and supported by [[Wikimedia corruption]]. Until you understand how that will sabotage the whole [[Research Wiki]] effort, you don't understand. So your request is refused, this need is still extant, and if you aren't working towards dealing with it, you aren't working, and it's time for someone else to run this project. | |||
4. The most effective way to claim corruption is to simply do so at [[Wikipedia]] itself, under a wide variety of [[IP address]]es and userids to minimize the ability of the [[sysop power structure]] to totally censor it. By doing so the analyses of people like [[English Wikipedia User Richardchilton]] - one of the [[Reds]] apparently - can be made visible and copied quickly by others before [[sysop vandalism]] of his analysis. | |||