Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators
9,854
edits
No edit summary |
(anwsers to 142.177.X.X. Please note the edits in Talk:Interwiki link standard first) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Putting all external links in proper [[interwiki link standard]] form is the first step to supporting it in software directly. If the [[standard wiki URI]] is also supported properly on the target wikis, the translation is automatic, no brains required, no knowledge of which version of [[MediaWiki]] or [[GetWiki]] they run, etc.. This is obviously necessary for the [[GFDL text corpus]] to evolve independent of [[Wikimedia]], which ought to be our goal. | Putting all external links in proper [[interwiki link standard]] form is the first step to supporting it in software directly. | ||
:May I point your attention to what I wrote in [[Talk:Interwiki link standard]] that you are requesting [[MediaWiki]] (or other) developers to reverse from | |||
service:language | |||
:to | |||
language:service | |||
:as an interwiki standard. highly unlikely. And what would be gained by the syntax change from the convention of now-and-here? Nothing IMO. | |||
If the [[standard wiki URI]] is also supported properly on the target wikis, the translation is automatic, no brains required, no knowledge of which version of [[MediaWiki]] or [[GetWiki]] they run, etc.. | |||
:Evolution of [[GPL]] and [[GFDL]] systems will drive it naturally to behave in this manner in the future, so I guess we agree on this point. | |||
This is obviously necessary for the [[GFDL text corpus]] to evolve independent of [[Wikimedia]], which ought to be our goal. | |||
:Independent? Whooa. Hold your horses. Wikipedia is established as the primary gateway into the vastest parts of the [[GFDL text corpus]] known to me so to declare '''independence''' is '''taking the larger crowd to note''' silly --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 21:52, 9 Mar 2004 (EET) | |||
If it isn't, we're not working on the same project, obviously. | If it isn't, we're not working on the same project, obviously. | ||
: Are we ? ;) |