E-waste: Difference between revisions
Procrustes (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m (Google does not know Project_Procrustes....) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''e-waste''' (never spelled with a capital E) is [[waste]] from [[electronics]]. It is often [[toxic waste]]. Also some types of electronics like [[cell phone]]s are thrown away on average once a year. Many projects focus on [[electronics re-use]] and [[electronics recycling]], and [[electronics standards]] to minimize [[obsolescence]]. One such is [[Project_Procrustes]]. | '''e-waste''' (never spelled with a capital E) is [[waste]] from [[electronics]]. It is often [[toxic waste]]. Also some types of electronics like [[cell phone]]s are thrown away on average once a year. Many projects focus on [[electronics re-use]] and [[electronics recycling]], and [[electronics standards]] to minimize [[obsolescence]]. One such is [[Project_Procrustes]]. | ||
---- | |||
Google does not know [[Project_Procrustes]] as described here, where can it be found? Should I understand this as a critique to my suggestion to using [[Java]] as the programming language. I know it's not the most [[ecological]] in terms of performance. [[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 22:00 May 6, 2003 (EEST) |
Revision as of 22:00, 6 May 2003
e-waste (never spelled with a capital E) is waste from electronics. It is often toxic waste. Also some types of electronics like cell phones are thrown away on average once a year. Many projects focus on electronics re-use and electronics recycling, and electronics standards to minimize obsolescence. One such is Project_Procrustes.
Google does not know Project_Procrustes as described here, where can it be found? Should I understand this as a critique to my suggestion to using Java as the programming language. I know it's not the most ecological in terms of performance. Juxo 22:00 May 6, 2003 (EEST)