Worst practices: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
 
m (delinking, to avoid involving this important concept with issues that are at least rather controversial and speculative, and have gotten quite personal.)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Worst practices''', the opposite of [[best practices]], are probably [[factionally defined]] as different groups think different things are "worst":
'''Worst practices''', the opposite of [[best practices]], are [[factionally defined]] because different groups think different things are "worst":


*[[Greens]] probably think [[deforestation]] and other [[extinction]] are worst
*[[Greens]] probably think [[deforestation]] and other [[extinction]] are worst
*[[Pinks]] probably think [[child slavery]] and [[spreading disease]] are worst
*[[Pinks]] probably think [[child slavery]] and [[spreading disease]] are worst
*[[Reds]] probably think [[excessive profit]] and [[prison labour]] are worst
*[[Reds]] probably think [[excessive profit]] and [[prison labour]] are worst
*[[Trolls]] probably think [[Wikimedia corruption]] and [[sysop vandalism]] are worst
*[[Trolls]] probably think and [[sysop vandalism]] are worst
*Some people probably think [[animal cruelty]] is worst


Regardless of these priorities, rack up enough "worst" and you can expect a [[red light]] to flash as your [[Consumerium buying signal]]!
Regardless of these [[teleological]] priorities, rack up enough "worst" across many [[faction]]s, and you can expect a [[red light]] to flash as the [[Consumerium buying signal]]!

Latest revision as of 18:21, 7 September 2004

Worst practices, the opposite of best practices, are factionally defined because different groups think different things are "worst":

Regardless of these teleological priorities, rack up enough "worst" across many factions, and you can expect a red light to flash as the Consumerium buying signal!