Worst practices: Difference between revisions
(as->because, because worst practices are defined into existence (and yes that is ontological, but we need not say so over and over again)) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*[[Reds]] probably think [[excessive profit]] and [[prison labour]] are worst | *[[Reds]] probably think [[excessive profit]] and [[prison labour]] are worst | ||
*[[Trolls]] probably think [[Wikimedia corruption]] and [[sysop vandalism]] are worst | *[[Trolls]] probably think [[Wikimedia corruption]] and [[sysop vandalism]] are worst | ||
*Some people probably think [[animal cruelty]] is worst | |||
Regardless of these [[teleological]] priorities, rack up enough "worst" across many [[faction]]s, and you can expect a [[red light]] to flash as the [[Consumerium buying signal]]! | Regardless of these [[teleological]] priorities, rack up enough "worst" across many [[faction]]s, and you can expect a [[red light]] to flash as the [[Consumerium buying signal]]! | ||
Revision as of 17:50, 28 July 2004
Worst practices, the opposite of best practices, are factionally defined because different groups think different things are "worst":
- Greens probably think deforestation and other extinction are worst
- Pinks probably think child slavery and spreading disease are worst
- Reds probably think excessive profit and prison labour are worst
- Trolls probably think Wikimedia corruption and sysop vandalism are worst
- Some people probably think animal cruelty is worst
Regardless of these teleological priorities, rack up enough "worst" across many factions, and you can expect a red light to flash as the Consumerium buying signal!