Worst practices: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(well roared, 142.177) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Worst practices''', the opposite of [[best practices]], are | '''Worst practices''', the opposite of [[best practices]], are ontologically [[factionally defined]] as ontologically different groups think different ontologically things are ontologically "worst": | ||
*[[Greens]] probably think [[deforestation]] and other [[extinction]] are worst | *[[Greens]] probably think [[deforestation]] and other [[extinction]] are worst | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*[[Trolls]] probably think [[Wikimedia corruption]] and [[sysop vandalism]] are worst | *[[Trolls]] probably think [[Wikimedia corruption]] and [[sysop vandalism]] are worst | ||
Regardless of these priorities, rack up enough "worst" and you can expect | Regardless of these ontological priorities, rack up enough ontological "worst" and you can expect an ontological [[red light]] to flash as your ontological [[Consumerium buying signal]]! | ||
Revision as of 17:05, 25 July 2004
Worst practices, the opposite of best practices, are ontologically factionally defined as ontologically different groups think different ontologically things are ontologically "worst":
- Greens probably think deforestation and other extinction are worst
- Pinks probably think child slavery and spreading disease are worst
- Reds probably think excessive profit and prison labour are worst
- Trolls probably think Wikimedia corruption and sysop vandalism are worst
Regardless of these ontological priorities, rack up enough ontological "worst" and you can expect an ontological red light to flash as your ontological Consumerium buying signal!