Talk:Service cycle: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:03, 16 March 2004

Maybe this must be figured out in depth first, filled in,

Yes. It must be investigated under which kinds of terms and what reliability this information is available from companies and what must our Researchers find out. Many companies do in-house studies on these issues and report them as environmental reports and social reports similar to fiscal reports

What is a feasible level of Service cycle information we aim to provide the consumer with.

and only then can we figure out when Consumerium Service access happens,

It seems clearer that Checkout Consumerium is likely the first in-store Consumerium Service to be made available. We should start researching the field of retail systems, who makes them, how are they integrated, what kind of platform and what software they run. I guess the Linux-players are more likely to be on the same wave-lenght as us. NFC systems embedded into mobile phones and checkout terminals would be the lowest-tech solution that would enable consumers to access Consumerium Services with ease at home or in the office by examining what they just bought and then adjust their buying pattern accordingly.

and only then what Consumerium Process is.

The whole management (govenance) issue boils down to "What is the Consumerium Process".

Since the services are what we want to represent, and the access must happen as decisions are made about the services, and then the process is trying to keep those decisions up to date with current assertions about the services, it seems we probably have to go in that order.

see above about Checkout Consumerium: buy, examine, re-evaluate, buy different --Juxo 15:03, 16 Mar 2004 (EET)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Maybe this must be figured out in depth first, filled in, and only then can we figure out when [[Consumerium Service access]] happens, and only then what [[Consumerium Process]] is.  Since the services are what we want to represent, and the access must happen as decisions are made about the services, and then the process is trying to keep those decisions up to date with current assertions about the services, it seems we probably have to go in that order.
+Maybe this must be figured out in depth first, filled in,
+:Yes. It must be investigated '''under which kinds of terms''' and '''what reliability''' this information is available from [[companies]] and what must our [[Consumerium:Researcher|Researcher]]s find out. Many companies do in-house studies on these issues and report them as [[environmental report]]s and [[social report]]s similar to [[fiscal report]]s
+:What is a '''feasible level''' of [[Service cycle]] information we '''aim to provide the [[consumer]]''' with.
+and only then can we figure out when [[Consumerium Service access]] happens,
+:It seems clearer that [[Checkout Consumerium]] is likely the first '''in-store''' [[Consumerium Service]] to be made available. We should start researching the field of [[retail systems]], who makes them, how are they integrated, what kind of platform and what software they run. I guess the [[w:Linux|Linux]]-players are more likely to be on the same wave-lenght as us. [[NFC]] systems embedded into mobile phones and checkout terminals would be the lowest-tech solution that would enable [[consumers]] to access [[Consumerium Services]] with ease at home or in the office by examining what they just bought and then adjust their buying pattern accordingly.
+and only then what [[Consumerium Process]] is.
+:The whole management ([[govenance]]) issue boils down to "What is the [[Consumerium Process]]".
+Since the services are what we want to represent, and the access must happen as decisions are made about the services, and then the process is trying to keep those decisions up to date with current assertions about the services, it seems we probably have to go in that order.
+:see above about [[Checkout Consumerium]]: '''buy, examine, re-evaluate, buy different''' --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 15:03, 16 Mar 2004 (EET)