Infrastructure owners trust: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(mv last para to talk page)
No edit summary
 
Line 2: Line 2:


The [[Wikimedia Board of Trustees]] for instance is 3/5 Bomis employees and has only two token females of non-American origin who have no power whatsoever, not even being consulted in such decisions as how to deal with the [[Red China block]], which the still-reigning [[GodKing]] chooses to deal with unilaterally via the "[[usual happy NPOV talk]]".  ''See also [[Wikimedia corruption]].''
The [[Wikimedia Board of Trustees]] for instance is 3/5 Bomis employees and has only two token females of non-American origin who have no power whatsoever, not even being consulted in such decisions as how to deal with the [[Red China block]], which the still-reigning [[GodKing]] chooses to deal with unilaterally via the "[[usual happy NPOV talk]]".  ''See also [[Wikimedia corruption]].''
[[Distributed Consumerium]] will actually not be dependent on any one owners' trust regarding central [[Consumerium Services]], since, it will run on widely distributed computers run by just anyone. 
However, the [[friendly retail]] locations will still be critically important and without their trust, it is a lot more difficult to deploy the [[Consumerium buying signal]].  So the focus for gaining this '''trust''' should be there, not on pleasing the various owners of infrastructure.
Anonymous user