Distributed database: Difference between revisions

(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)

Line 4:

*[[standard wiki URI]]s making uniformly licensed and formatted articles available, e.g. [[public domain interwiki]] or [[GFDL corpus]] [[wikitext standard]] collections, at URIs which are easy to remember and persistent

*semi-structured wikitext with [[interwiki link standard]]s and [[interwiki identity standard]]s that make it possible to specify "what" and "who" in a way that works across an entire corpus - this would create a true [[GFDL Corpus]]

*standardized [[XML DTD]] and [[XML-Schema]]s, e.g. as proposed for health care

*standardized [[XML DTD]] and [[XML-Schema]]s, e.g. as proposed for health care [http://www.hl7.org/library/committees/structure/minutes/Minutes041999.doc here]

http://www.hl7.org/library/committees/structure/minutes/Minutes041999.doc

*[[object-oriented database]]s like [[ORB]] to make the data more consistently available via one programmatic interface;

*[[relational database]]s that further structure the data but restrict data types to a fixed set; Typically these are quite complex to truly distribute

*[[relational database]]s that further structure the data but restrict data types to a fixed set; Typically these are quite complex to truly distribute, but see [[relational state transfer]] for how this might be done with help from:

*[[peer to peer]] networks that are more strictly hierarchical and reliant on [[namespace mechanics]] to match finder and publisher, e.g. [[Overnet]], some [[REST]] equivalents now in early testing

Any of these might be required in [[Distributed Consumerium]]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 *[[standard wiki URI]]s making uniformly licensed and formatted articles available, e.g. [[public domain interwiki]] or [[GFDL corpus]] [[wikitext standard]] collections, at URIs which are easy to remember and persistent
 *semi-structured wikitext with [[interwiki link standard]]s and [[interwiki identity standard]]s that make it possible to specify "what" and "who" in a way that works across an entire corpus - this would create a true [[GFDL Corpus]]
-*standardized [[XML DTD]] and [[XML-Schema]]s, e.g. as proposed for health care
+*standardized [[XML DTD]] and [[XML-Schema]]s, e.g. as proposed for health care [http://www.hl7.org/library/committees/structure/minutes/Minutes041999.doc here]
-http://www.hl7.org/library/committees/structure/minutes/Minutes041999.doc
 *[[object-oriented database]]s like [[ORB]] to make the data more consistently available via one programmatic interface;
-*[[relational database]]s that further structure the data but restrict data types to a fixed set;  Typically these are quite complex to truly distribute
+*[[relational database]]s that further structure the data but restrict data types to a fixed set;  Typically these are quite complex to truly distribute, but see [[relational state transfer]] for how this might be done with help from:
 *[[peer to peer]] networks that are more strictly hierarchical and reliant on [[namespace mechanics]] to match finder and publisher, e.g. [[Overnet]], some [[REST]] equivalents now in early testing
 Any of these might be required in [[Distributed Consumerium]]