Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators
9,854
edits
Audit: Difference between revisions
anwser to 142.177.X.X. Good question and a difficult one
(questions) |
(anwser to 142.177.X.X. Good question and a difficult one) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
How can we '''audit''' Consumerium to make sure it is accurate and reliable? Who is the [[auditor]]? What is the [[audit process]]? When does it happen? | How can we '''audit''' Consumerium to make sure it is accurate and reliable? Who is the [[auditor]]? What is the [[audit process]]? When does it happen? How can we audit content providers? | ||
:These are all problematic questions. I suppose we'll set up some democratic administration organisation to see that all is done without foul-play. [[Consumerium Counsel]]?? | |||
:Since '''ideally''' the Consumerium team doesn't actually input any information on their own, but just provide the possibility for others to put their content available to consumers. Most of the reliability issues can only be solved by agreeing on '''rules that define what different participators can input''' | |||
:Problems like: | |||
#It doesn't make any sense that [[Company X]] employees put some accusations about [[Company Y]]. | |||
#It doesn't make any sense that we assume we could avoid such things happening, by setting rules we can't enforce. | |||
: This question of [[Content Verification]] is the most problematic ones we face. I've thought about it a long time and I still don't have a working proposal. Any ideas? | |||