|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| '''Feedback is a very essential [[feature]] because it enables [[companies]] to gain valuable insight via [[consumerium]]'''
| | Hi, |
|
| |
|
| Feedback is intended for businesses and owners, [[reviews]] are intended for other consumers.
| | I am getting in touch with creative profiles in Marketing Agencies to see if you would be interested in our tool: https://www.aismartad.com/, it's like Canva but our Artificial Intelligence do most of the work for you. |
|
| |
|
| It's mostly about [[Consumer]]s communicating to [[producer]]s about their [[product]] offerings, though it is possible to implement feedback for about anything. [[Consumer]]s who are in hurry or don't have an suitable input device (such as a Bluetooth keyboard provided by the store) can use prewritten feedback messages that usually take the form of:
| | So you can generate beautiful creatives, optimized for better click-through rates and conversions without increasing your workload. |
|
| |
|
| * "I am discouraging others from buying your product because..."
| | If this is something that can interest you or your team, it has 7 days free trial: https://www.aismartad.com/ |
| * "I didn't buy your product because..."
| |
| * "I am hesitating buying your product because..."
| |
| * "I bought your product because..."
| |
| * "I will encourage others to buy your product because..."
| |
|
| |
|
| ''Feedback can be used to enhance life-enhancing cycles and stop life-destroying ones.''
| | All the best, |
| | | Tufan |
| [[w:Donella_Meadows%27_twelve_leverage_points_to_intervene_in_a_system|Ecological concepts of leverage]] usually rely on some notion of [[w:feedback|feedback]]. Sister projects to [[Consumerium]], e.g. [[Wikipedia]], have used these concepts directly [[m:twelve leverage points|as leverage in governance]], e.g. defining limits of [[etiquette]], [[vandalism]], [[edit war]]s, to prevent a [[w:race to the bottom|'race to the bottom']] in destructive tactics. And, more happily, encouraging notions of [[ethics]], [[community]], [[governance]] and even useful [[groupthink]] (factions or parties simplifying [[discourse]] on governance questions) to enhance the life of all those touched by Wikipedia.
| |
| | |
| Likewise, many parties in Consumerium, including those "targetted" by it, can benefit because:
| |
| | |
| * It signals [[companies]] that profit opportunities are available if they meet the new higher standards of [[w:moral purchasing|moral purchasing]] of their market
| |
| * It gives [[companies]] the chance to accelerate their product development pace to outrace the competition to meet these new higher standards
| |
| * It gives [[consumer]]s the an uniform interface to contact all companies
| |
| * Feedback can be [[anonymous]] or ID'd with an email address if reply is desired - thus limiting targetting of consumers by companies
| |
| * The feedback can be distributed to the whole [[supply chain]].
| |
| * The feedback can be gathered for use in the political system, to signal the desire of many citizens in the body politic to require some change, e.g. better [[ingredients marking]] and [[mandatory label]]s.
| |
| | |
| Powerful as feedback is, it can be over-ruled by the higher-level control of [[information flows]], e.g. who controls the forms used for feedback, [[rules]] of the system (incentives, punishment, constraints), [[self-organization]], [[goals]] of the system which can rule out whole areas of investigation or dialogue, the [[mindset]] out of which the goals, rules, feedback structure arise, e.g. some will object to anyone making a [[profit]] from Consumerium, and the [[power]] to transcend paradigms, overthrow an elite, change a structure.
| |
| | |
| Usually many decision on these levels must be made before feedback can be fully understood and used to apply any real leverage on the parties in any system.
| |