Jump to content

Feedback: Difference between revisions

2,723 bytes removed ,  28 January 2023
no edit summary
m (Reverted edits by 154.9.44.97 (talk) to last revision by Jukeboksi)
Tag: Rollback
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Feedback is a very essential [[feature]] because it enables [[companies]] to gain valuable insight via [[consumerium]]'''
Hi,


Feedback is intended for businesses and owners, [[reviews]] are intended for other consumers.
I am getting in touch with creative profiles in Marketing Agencies to see if you would be interested in our tool: https://www.aismartad.com/, it's like Canva but our Artificial Intelligence do most of the work for you.


It's mostly about [[Consumer]]s communicating to [[producer]]s about their [[product]] offerings, though it is possible to implement feedback for about anything. [[Consumer]]s who are in hurry or don't have an suitable input device (such as a Bluetooth keyboard provided by the store) can use prewritten feedback messages that usually take the form of:
So you can generate beautiful creatives, optimized for better click-through rates and conversions without increasing your workload.


* "I am discouraging others from buying your product because..."
If this is something that can interest you or your team, it has 7 days free trial: https://www.aismartad.com/
* "I didn't buy your product because..."
* "I am hesitating buying your product because..."
* "I bought your product because..."
* "I will encourage others to buy your product because..."


''Feedback can be used to enhance life-enhancing cycles and stop life-destroying ones.''
All the best,
 
Tufan
[[w:Donella_Meadows%27_twelve_leverage_points_to_intervene_in_a_system|Ecological concepts of leverage]] usually rely on some notion of [[w:feedback|feedback]].  Sister projects to [[Consumerium]], e.g. [[Wikipedia]], have used these concepts directly [[m:twelve leverage points|as leverage in governance]], e.g. defining limits of [[etiquette]], [[vandalism]], [[edit war]]s, to prevent a [[w:race to the bottom|'race to the bottom']] in destructive tactics.  And, more happily, encouraging notions of [[ethics]], [[community]], [[governance]] and even useful [[groupthink]] (factions or parties simplifying [[discourse]] on governance questions) to enhance the life of all those touched by Wikipedia.
 
Likewise, many parties in Consumerium, including those "targetted" by it, can benefit because:
 
* It signals [[companies]] that profit opportunities are available if they meet the new higher standards of [[w:moral purchasing|moral purchasing]] of their market
* It gives [[companies]] the chance to accelerate their product development pace to outrace the competition to meet these new higher standards
* It gives [[consumer]]s the an uniform interface to contact all companies
* Feedback can be [[anonymous]] or ID'd with an email address if reply is desired - thus limiting targetting of consumers by companies
* The feedback can be distributed to the whole [[supply chain]].
* The feedback can be gathered for use in the political system, to signal the desire of many citizens in the body politic to require some change, e.g. better [[ingredients marking]] and [[mandatory label]]s.
 
Powerful as feedback is, it can be over-ruled by the higher-level control of [[information flows]], e.g. who controls the forms used for feedback, [[rules]]  of the system (incentives, punishment, constraints), [[self-organization]], [[goals]] of the system which can rule out whole areas of investigation or dialogue, the [[mindset]] out of which the goals, rules, feedback structure arise, e.g. some will object to anyone making a [[profit]] from Consumerium, and the [[power]] to transcend paradigms, overthrow an elite, change a structure.
 
Usually many decision on these levels must be made before feedback can be fully understood and used to apply any real leverage on the parties in any system.
Anonymous user
We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.