Consumerium:Proposed deletions: Difference between revisions

Consumerium:Proposed deletions (edit)

Revision as of 13:30, 9 September 2004

682 bytes added , 9 September 2004

anwsers to claims of "unaccountable deletions"

Jukeboksi

Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators

9,842

edits

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 ::Your reasoning is flawed:  MANY nonprofits are funded from the proceeds of lawsuits against unethical journalists.  MANY.  Hugh Grant and Liz Hurley are only one good example.
-::If this goes, kill [[talk:Craig Hubley]] too as the only reason to keep it around is to sue for funding.
+:::Many may be but on the other hand you can quote the Grant&Hurley case as an example of this because it was them who [[donation|donated]] the money to the [[non-profit]] not that the non-profit would have sued someone. Keep your facts and your fiction apart --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 16:30, 9 Sep 2004 (EEST)
-::: LOL. if Mr Hubley ventures forth such an evil plan and succeeds, he too will be a funded troll. MUAHAHAHAAH [[User:69.195.36.213|69.195.36.213]] 04:55, 9 Sep 2004 (EEST)
+::If this goes, remove [[talk:Craig Hubley]] too as the only reason to keep it around is to sue for funding.
+::: LOL. if Mr. Hubley ventures forth such an evil plan and succeeds, he too will be a funded troll. MUAHAHAHAAH [[User:69.195.36.213|69.195.36.213]] 04:55, 9 Sep 2004 (EEST)
 *[[Gus Kouwenhoven]], '''unaccountably deleted''', apparently a personal friend of someone who thinks [[sysop vandalism]] is appropriate and warranted to protect the reputation of this most excellent person Mr Kouwenhoven who has so many rights that he can pretty much wipe out a whole continent before anyone at [[Consumerium]] would ever notice
-*[[Fox News point of view]], '''unaccountably deleted''', apparently by someone who thinks that it isn't important or biasing that [[Wikimedia]] and [[Bomis]] are often accused of this view, e.g. by [[English Wikipedia User Richardchilton]], or that it's a major focus of debate about media in the USA.
+.:Deleted per standard [[rules]] that are in place to help us focus on developing some kind of information gathering and publishing system without getting dragged in accountability issues '''here and now''' so we can focus on how we deal with these when they arise in the production stage. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 16:30, 9 Sep 2004 (EEST)
+*[[Fox News point of view]], '''unaccountably deleted''', apparently by someone who thinks that it isn't important or biasing that [[Wikimedia]] and Bomis are often accused of this view, e.g. by [[English Wikipedia User Richardchilton]], or that it's a major focus of debate about media in the USA.
+::Same as above. See [[Rules]]
 *[[Alleged Wikimedia corruption]], recommandation.