Jump to content

Research Wiki pilot: Difference between revisions

629 bytes removed ,  21 September 2004
rm the usual troll rethorics
(no "Wikipedians" please, we need people who are not globs of status-seeking-control-imposing-technology-driven shit to be in charge, to get anything done)
 
(rm the usual troll rethorics)
Line 25: Line 25:


These pilot wikis are small and don't have a lot of [[wiki management]] problems yet.  The above are the minimum required to achieve at least near-convergence.  Other structural stuff like [[best cases]], [[worst cases]], [[user stories]], etc., [[trolls]] leave to you to manage.  It's probably best to avoid that structure for now - it only starts to matter once there is a very rigorous mission, that fails easily, or, far too many people involved.   
These pilot wikis are small and don't have a lot of [[wiki management]] problems yet.  The above are the minimum required to achieve at least near-convergence.  Other structural stuff like [[best cases]], [[worst cases]], [[user stories]], etc., [[trolls]] leave to you to manage.  It's probably best to avoid that structure for now - it only starts to matter once there is a very rigorous mission, that fails easily, or, far too many people involved.   
'''Consumerpedia'' isn't there, but, it's already adopting bad habits from there.  An example of this kind of problems is [[Symbolwiki]] which [[Angela]] has begun to destroy.  She is destroying its [[troll-friendly]] start with her sysop status.  Similarly, you will never be able to use one scrap of what's at [[Consumerpedia]] to create a [[Consumerium:intermediate page]] or ever affect a [[Consumerium buying signal]] if she gets involved.  She is absolute poison to projects that have to work from actual user [[buying criteria]].  And it may be that [[User:DanKeshet]] is no better.  Certainly he's off to a bad start.


=== serious ===
=== serious ===
9,837

edits

We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.