Consumerium:Proposed deletions: Difference between revisions
noting unaccounted deletions out of process for no reason other than fear and willingness to kowtow to scum
(suing for funding is a viable approach if one can count on a regular stream of offenses (e.g. by Wikimedia), and ending Wikimedia may be necessary to end their attacks and training of attacker) |
(noting unaccounted deletions out of process for no reason other than fear and willingness to kowtow to scum) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
::If this goes, kill [[talk:Craig Hubley]] too as the only reason to keep it around is to sue for funding. | ::If this goes, kill [[talk:Craig Hubley]] too as the only reason to keep it around is to sue for funding. | ||
*[[Gus Kouwenhoven]], '''unaccountably deleted''', apparently a personal friend of someone who thinks [[sysop vandalism]] is appropriate and warranted to protect the reputation of this most excellent person Mr Kouwenhoven who has so many rights that he can pretty much wipe out a whole continent before anyone at [[Consumerium]] would ever notice | |||
*[[Fox News point of view]], '''unaccountably deleted''', apparently by someone who thinks that it isn't important or biasing that [[Wikimedia]] and [[Bomis]] are often accused of this view, e.g. by [[English Wikipedia User Richardchilton]], or that it's a major focus of debate about media in the USA. | |||