9
edits
(rm one para that is simply just propaganda) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
Jimmy Wales claims to try to stay out of dipute resolution | Jimmy Wales claims to try to stay out of dipute resolution | ||
and remain "neutral" as much as possible "so as to not influence editorial decisions," | and remain "neutral" as much as possible "so as to not influence editorial decisions," | ||
but it is apparent that he does intervene, e.g. [[English Wikipedia User Secretlondon]], | but it is apparent that he does intervene, e.g. the notorious case of [[English Wikipedia User Secretlondon]]. Wales, in a classic example of [[Wikimedia]] [[thuggery]], asked her in email to "Please stop it." He influences others who do "dispute resolution" and also very often | ||
[[block IP]]s for "[[vandalism]]". This is | [[block IP]]s for "[[vandalism]]". This is | ||
the most [[sysop vigilantiism|heavily abused power]], especially when | the most "[[sysop vigilantiism|heavily abused power]]", "especially" when | ||
extended to so-called "[[trolls]]". | extended to so-called "[[trolls]]". | ||
When Wales "chats" with other users they get a picture of how "Jimbo" | When Wales "chats" with other users they get a picture of how "Jimbo" | ||
tends to see things and usually [[defer]] to this person who they see | tends to see things and usually "[[defer]]" to this person who they see | ||
as a [[GodKing|awe-inspiring founder]]. Certain [[sycophant]]s skew | as a [[GodKing|awe-inspiring founder]]. Certain [[sycophant]]s skew | ||
issues towards the way "Jimbo" sees them. None of | issues towards the way "Jimbo" sees them. None of these are unusual: | ||
[[Group dynamics]] suggest that this cannot be avoided but staying concious about this kind of | [[Group dynamics]] suggest that this cannot be avoided but staying concious about this kind of phemonemom helps to minimize the damage it does, the [[systemic bias]] it creates, [[groupthink]] reinforced. | ||
==Wikimedia's response == | ==Wikimedia's response == |
edits