Jump to content

Identifying people: Difference between revisions

six words: safe, done, evil, fair, ignore, forgive - MAKE A faction
(identifying companies on the other hand...)
(six words: safe, done, evil, fair, ignore, forgive - MAKE A faction)
Line 1: Line 1:
Having identification data on someones person in the system without:  
Having identification data on someones person in the system without:  


A) Explicit consent from the person in question  
A) Explicit consent from the person in question (recorded where?  how?  when?)


or  
or  
Line 8: Line 8:


is something I oppose up to the level of causing a [[w:fork|fork]], which would be very unfortunate should it come to that.  --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]]
is something I oppose up to the level of causing a [[w:fork|fork]], which would be very unfortunate should it come to that.  --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]]
:We all view some of someone else's behaviour as [[amoral purchasing]], i.e. "evil".  But we accept some [[political economy]] to limit those liabilities and tell us when something is "done".  You do not need to agree what is "good" but to some degree you must agree what is "[[safe]]", "[[done]]", and "[[evil]]" to agree what is "[[fair]]".  Because it is also good to [[ignore]] and [[forgive]].  So there must be a debate on all six of those words I think.  Those who agree on when all six must be used can agree on anything else and form a sort of [[faction]] that cooperates to coordinate the data.  Fair?


----
----
Anonymous user
We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.