Identifying people: Difference between revisions
six words: safe, done, evil, fair, ignore, forgive - MAKE A faction
(identifying companies on the other hand...) |
(six words: safe, done, evil, fair, ignore, forgive - MAKE A faction) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Having identification data on someones person in the system without: | Having identification data on someones person in the system without: | ||
A) Explicit consent from the person in question | A) Explicit consent from the person in question (recorded where? how? when?) | ||
or | or | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
is something I oppose up to the level of causing a [[w:fork|fork]], which would be very unfortunate should it come to that. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] | is something I oppose up to the level of causing a [[w:fork|fork]], which would be very unfortunate should it come to that. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] | ||
:We all view some of someone else's behaviour as [[amoral purchasing]], i.e. "evil". But we accept some [[political economy]] to limit those liabilities and tell us when something is "done". You do not need to agree what is "good" but to some degree you must agree what is "[[safe]]", "[[done]]", and "[[evil]]" to agree what is "[[fair]]". Because it is also good to [[ignore]] and [[forgive]]. So there must be a debate on all six of those words I think. Those who agree on when all six must be used can agree on anything else and form a sort of [[faction]] that cooperates to coordinate the data. Fair? | |||
---- | ---- | ||