Jump to content

Alternate wiki-implementations: Difference between revisions

revise tikiwiki -JD
m (formatting)
(revise tikiwiki -JD)
Line 48: Line 48:
</tr>
</tr>
<td>
<td>
*Not humanly possible for [[end user feedback]] to reach developers at all - form for describing [[wiki feature request]] incomprehensible even to a [[usability guru]]
*Feature rich (e.g. forums, picture gallery, blog, maps, email newsletter)
*Comment forum on every page
*Granular user group permissions
*PHP based
*PHP based
*meets ''many'' standards ([[CSS]], [[XHTML]], [[RDF]]
*Uses different [[wikisyntax]] then Wikipedia
*Meets ''many'' standards ([[CSS]], [[XHTML]], [[RDF]]
*Relies on [[pear.php.net]], [[smarty.php.net]]
*Relies on [[pear.php.net]], [[smarty.php.net]]
*email/forums (and integration) built-in
*email/forums (and integration) built-in
Line 57: Line 60:
*Visualization of wiki-links
*Visualization of wiki-links
*Polls built in
*Polls built in
*Many developers doing lots of detail work on CM and CMS
*Highly active development
*supports Postgres, Oracle, Sybase and [[SQLite]] (built in PHP 5.0!) databases not just MySQL - strategic to integrate with some [[essential projects]]
*Large developer community with scattered documentation and communition forums
*Supports Postgres, Oracle, Sybase and [[SQLite]] (built in PHP 5.0!) databases not just MySQL - strategic to integrate with some [[essential projects]]
*developers [[eat their own dog food]] = run current beta as their live site for all development, so any problem is immediately obvious to every developer
*developers [[eat their own dog food]] = run current beta as their live site for all development, so any problem is immediately obvious to every developer
</td>
</td>
Anonymous user
We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.