Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators
9,854
edits
New Troll point of view: Difference between revisions
note about one para not sticking to reality entirely but overriding practice with theory
(rm useless sentence in regard to us somehow shunning jimbo) |
(note about one para not sticking to reality entirely but overriding practice with theory) |
||
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
Soft security would say that the individual is working against the interests of the community, and that the community should protect itself. The Consumerium school says that disruption is sometimes necessary, and therefore almost al disruption be tolerated (since no one is in a position to say which disruption is good and which is bad). | Soft security would say that the individual is working against the interests of the community, and that the community should protect itself. The Consumerium school says that disruption is sometimes necessary, and therefore almost al disruption be tolerated (since no one is in a position to say which disruption is good and which is bad). | ||
:This section does not take into account the realities of responding to people breaking [[rules]] and [[guidelines]] that are here to advance cooperation between contributors by stating framework of how to advance things. Sometimes use of sysop power is required however unfortunate that may be from the New Troll point of view. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 14:05, 14 Jul 2004 (EEST) | |||
=== Positive reputation considered evil === | === Positive reputation considered evil === | ||