Jump to content

Unsubstantiated claims of Wikimedia corruption: Difference between revisions

note about false claims on both "sides"
(rm politics)
(note about false claims on both "sides")
Line 4: Line 4:
*"Wikimedia Foundation" not consulted when legally important decisions made, e.g. [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2004-June/000384.html in response to Wikipedia being blocked in China], which is the biggest issue it has ever faced, the [[GodKing]] unilaterally "hereby authorize Andrew Lih to make a statement on our behalf, based on [[usual happy NPOV talk]]."  This was less than one day after the "election" of [[Wikimedia Board of Trustees]] who evidently had no opinion that mattered, on this all-important question.
*"Wikimedia Foundation" not consulted when legally important decisions made, e.g. [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2004-June/000384.html in response to Wikipedia being blocked in China], which is the biggest issue it has ever faced, the [[GodKing]] unilaterally "hereby authorize Andrew Lih to make a statement on our behalf, based on [[usual happy NPOV talk]]."  This was less than one day after the "election" of [[Wikimedia Board of Trustees]] who evidently had no opinion that mattered, on this all-important question.
*false claims added to [[Wikimedia]] article here, and true claims removed
*false claims added to [[Wikimedia]] article here, and true claims removed
::Note that most false claims here have been made by [[142.177.X.X]] who seems to be on a personal vendetta on Wikipedia for banning him for persistent non-encyclopedic edits in the past
*[[technological escalation]] against [[Recyclopedia]] and threatened against [[Wikinfo]]
*[[technological escalation]] against [[Recyclopedia]] and threatened against [[Wikinfo]]
*users not consulted when user environment changes
*users not consulted when user environment changes
9,842

edits

We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.