Jump to content

User:Jukeboksi/Blog/June2004: Difference between revisions

"opinioned edits will have a distinct wiki " is totally wrong and insensible - WHO CAN TELL what is "too opinionated" without a fight? it needs a method/algorithm not "another wiki"
(still for a separate wiki for opinionated with reasoning)
("opinioned edits will have a distinct wiki " is totally wrong and insensible - WHO CAN TELL what is "too opinionated" without a fight? it needs a method/algorithm not "another wiki")
Line 1: Line 1:
24.6.2004
24.6.2004


Today I'm trying to get into [http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.oop.php OOP in PHP]. [[User:TimStarling|TimStarling]] is helping out with my newbieness. And still implementing [[Export-import]] in a reasonably advanced manner is one concrete goal right now. And I'm determined that opinioned edits will have a distinct wiki ([[Opinion Wiki]] which will then in time implement [[TCE]] functionality. In a discrete wiki this can be done with accessing '''SQL''' directly instead of modifying [[MediaWiki]] code, which leads to simple design and implementation.
Today I'm trying to get into [http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.oop.php OOP in PHP]. [[User:TimStarling|TimStarling]] is helping out with my newbieness. And still implementing [[Export-import]] in a reasonably advanced manner is one concrete goal right now.  
 
And I'm determined that opinioned edits will have a distinct wiki ([[Opinion Wiki]] which will then in time implement [[TCE]] functionality. In a discrete wiki this can be done with accessing '''SQL''' directly instead of modifying [[MediaWiki]] code, which leads to simple design and implementation.
 
::This is just wrong.  All edits are "opinionated", especially with the subject matter we're going to deal with.  Trying to move everything YOU think is opinionated elsewhere will just result in the [[politics as usual]].  What would move is necessarily [[factionally defined]], there's no objectivity there.  The right answer is a method for [[edits, votes and bets|objective scoring or voting or betting], like [[answer recommendation]] for instance.  Qualitative argument (talk page style) can be structured as [[TIPAESA]] but proliferating wikis is just wrong.  Only one decision is being made:  whether to publish the research or not.  That requires more focus, not more spread out text all over the place. 
 
----
----
22.6.2004
22.6.2004
Anonymous user
We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.