Essential projects: Difference between revisions

156 bytes removed ,  24 April 2012
removing stale link, mentioning the major bodies of the GFDL corpus
m (interra no longer exists)
(removing stale link, mentioning the major bodies of the GFDL corpus)
Line 3: Line 3:
'''Essential projects''' are [[interesting projects]] we can't really ignore.  They are doing things that we have to do, and we are far better off working with them, than ignoring them.  In many cases they will be doing something before we do it here, and maybe better.  So tracking them closely is useful.
'''Essential projects''' are [[interesting projects]] we can't really ignore.  They are doing things that we have to do, and we are far better off working with them, than ignoring them.  In many cases they will be doing something before we do it here, and maybe better.  So tracking them closely is useful.


*[[GFDL Corpus]] despite the various thugs trying to control it for their own commercial interests
*[[GFDL Corpus]] despite the various thugs trying to control it for their own commercial interests - [[Wikipedia]], [[Simple English Wikipedia]], [[Wikibooks]] and [[Wiktionary]]


*[[wikitext standard]] efforts, notably at [http://www.Metaweb.com/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=wikitext_standard Metaweb] and [http://www.recyclopedia.info/?title=wikitext_standard Recyclopedia], and [http://wwww.recyclopedia.info/?title=GetWiki GetWiki] software project.
*[[wikitext standard]] efforts


::''(note:  [[Meta-Wikipedia]] is now devoted to [[software imperialism]] and [[mediawiki]] hegemony, and cannot be considered a valid forum to discuss any such "standard";  As an example of a failed attempt to organize against a cabal, see the[http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Wikipedias_Forum United Wikipedias Forum] - how to get a huge 40-language project governed in [[Simple English]] without a cabal taking it over completely.  Obviously this has failed.''
::''(note:  [[Meta-Wikipedia]] is now devoted to [[software imperialism]] and [[mediawiki]] hegemony, and cannot be considered a valid forum to discuss any such "standard";  As an example of a failed attempt to organize against a cabal, see the[http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Wikipedias_Forum United Wikipedias Forum] - how to get a huge 40-language project governed in [[Simple English]] without a cabal taking it over completely.  Obviously this has failed.''
9,842

edits