Jump to content

User:Jukeboksi/Blog/March2004: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(todays work and plans for the next days)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
21.3.2004
21.3.2004


Today I've been concentrating on outlining the [[Consumerium Process]] in relation of [[Noise Wiki]] to [[Signal Wiki]] trying to take both [[troll friendly]]ness and '''stability''' and '''reliability''' and practical issues of technical implementation into account. I'll try to merge the material from [[Content Wiki]], [[TCE]], [[Campaigns]], [[Opinion Wiki]], [[Direct Vote]]s,�[[Indirect Vote]]s and [[WikiVote]]s to these articles or somewhere where we can '''have clarity on our implementation plan'''
Today I've been concentrating on outlining the [[Consumerium Process]] in relation of [[Noise Wiki]] to [[Signal Wiki]] trying to take both [[troll friendly]]ness and '''stability''' and '''reliability''' and practical issues of technical implementation into account.  
 
:See comments at [[Talk:Research Wiki]].  Noise implies [[Development Wiki]] more than [[Research Wiki]].  The name "noise wiki" is bad for many reasons.  What prevents anyone from putting in any crap, and why should someone who is not basically worried about the [[Consumerium buying signal]], but just wants to write articles, contribute stuff to be called "noise"?  They'd contribute diligent "research" to a [[Research Wiki]], probably, but why volunteer good material to a wiki whose very name invites crap?  But anyway get the functions right first, names right later.
 
I'll try to merge the material from [[Content Wiki]], [[TCE]], [[Campaigns]], [[Opinion Wiki]], [[Direct Vote]]s,�[[Indirect Vote]]s and [[WikiVote]]s to these articles or somewhere where we can '''have clarity on our implementation plan'''
 
:Please combine all the voting stuff into [[edits, votes and bets]] or at least argue for this design there so we can look at how they interact.  And yes spending time reading something is a bet of your time. 
 
:There is no final design, so this is not just about "implementation".  It's ONE PROPOSED DESIGN.  We should have three or four, and they should compete.
 
----
----
20.3.2004
20.3.2004
Anonymous user
We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.