Jump to content

Neutrality dispute: Difference between revisions

m
removing silly sentence that w: would point to somewhere else then the English Wikipedia since mediawiki is developed primarily for Wikipedia
(links, intro)
m (removing silly sentence that w: would point to somewhere else then the English Wikipedia since mediawiki is developed primarily for Wikipedia)
Line 7: Line 7:
=== Content vs. opinion - where is neutrality possible?  desirable? ===
=== Content vs. opinion - where is neutrality possible?  desirable? ===


So it is safest to say that Wikipedia has had good short-run (three years) of success with its NPOV policy, and deals reasonably well with terminology and even identity disputes of the most obvious kind, resulting in decent factoring of articles and mostly-respected identity systems and claims of identity, but many incidents ultimately of a political nature that would sink Consumerium on the scale we expect them in our [[Content Wiki]].  ''And which are very likely to sink Wikipedia itself before it is five years old - it is already generating a goodly number of forks leading to a [[bad copy problem]] - one will replace it as the "leading arbiter of the [[GFDL text corpus]]". At that point [[w:]] will point somewhere else!''
So it is safest to say that Wikipedia has had good short-run (three years) of success with its NPOV policy, and deals reasonably well with terminology and even identity disputes of the most obvious kind, resulting in decent factoring of articles and mostly-respected identity systems and claims of identity, but many incidents ultimately of a political nature that would sink Consumerium on the scale we expect them in our [[Content Wiki]].  ''And which are very likely to sink Wikipedia itself before it is five years old - it is already generating a goodly number of forks leading to a [[bad copy problem]] - one will replace it as the "leading arbiter of the [[GFDL text corpus]]".''


So what does one do when neutrality is disputed in the content wiki?  Removing isolating disputed claims to [[Opinion Wiki]] circles is not enough.
So what does one do when neutrality is disputed in the content wiki?  Removing isolating disputed claims to [[Opinion Wiki]] circles is not enough.
9,842

edits

We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.