Talk:Consumerium Credit: Difference between revisions
yeah, there's issues, so link them from worst cases or threats even, that's why this is a separate scenario/proposal on its own page
m (bad idea) |
(yeah, there's issues, so link them from worst cases or threats even, that's why this is a separate scenario/proposal on its own page) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Oh no no no. This is not a good idea even to throw in the air. We should focus on implementing the planned [[Features]] for the [[consumer]] and [[Consumerium Services]] for more active participants and leave this kind of stuff to the technology consultant groups who are all busy trying to invent something to keep them busy in the eyes of their customers | Oh no no no. This is not a good idea even to throw in the air. We should focus on implementing the planned [[Features]] for the [[consumer]] and [[Consumerium Services]] for more active participants and leave this kind of stuff to the technology consultant groups who are all busy trying to invent something to keep them busy in the eyes of their customers. | ||
:That's why I put it on its own page. It's linked from [[visions]] and [[best cases]] now. Feel free to link it from [[worst cases]] and even [[threats]] with an explanation of how it could go wrong and discredit/disincentivize the whole system. Frankly I don't see any other way to actually ''know'' whether a user obeyed their own [[buying criteria]], and the '''Ubiquitous''' case actually implies more [[privacy]] exposure by revealing whether someone bought something bad to everyone ''else''. | |||