Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators
9,842
edits
Talk:142.177.X.X: Difference between revisions
so we bet on betting? recursive_loop(waste_time_and_energy);
No edit summary |
(so we bet on betting? recursive_loop(waste_time_and_energy);) |
||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
You want to get things really going? Figure out the rules which will be used to govern the [[Content Wiki]] and [[Opinion Wiki]]. Like who gets to write what and who gets to delete what on what grounds and other issues that will produce an abundance of allegiations of bias and flamebaits and flamewars that will just exhaust everyone involved. --[[User:Juxo|really tired Juxo]] | You want to get things really going? Figure out the rules which will be used to govern the [[Content Wiki]] and [[Opinion Wiki]]. Like who gets to write what and who gets to delete what on what grounds and other issues that will produce an abundance of allegiations of bias and flamebaits and flamewars that will just exhaust everyone involved. --[[User:Juxo|really tired Juxo]] | ||
---- | |||
''Sure, double or nothing.'' | |||
:''You're on.'' Seems we are now officially betting on the future of the idea of betting. Now we just have to decide what is the issue we are in this bet for? In my humble view it is whether it legally, organisationally and practically ''plausible'' to implement [[betting]] on future issues. | |||
:How can we even determine the result of this bet without [[fork]]ing to a version with no bets and a version with bets? Is it really worth a few tens of grams of soft ice cream with chocolate crumbles? Why would we want to do this? Who is the [[trusted auditor]] that determines the outcome and on what grounds? IMHO this whole bet is just a waste of time, energy and soft ice cream that could be used more constructively if you just got to grips that [[betting]] as an official [[feature]] is just not plausible and would cause more problems of integrity and manageability then it would solve. | |||