Jump to content

Alternate wiki-implementations: Difference between revisions

starting head-to-head comparison of alternatives (stubbish)
(for assessing the ups and downs offered by various wiki implementations. so please the discussion around that around here)
 
(starting head-to-head comparison of alternatives (stubbish))
Line 1: Line 1:
Currently 3 out of 20 of our registered users are registered [[MediaWiki]] developers, which makes our percentage of developers among users '''15%''', which is likely the highest figure any public MediaWiki installation can boost so that is an good incentative to try to adapt MediaWiki for our use over other wikis
Currently 3 out of 20 of our registered users are registered [[MediaWiki]] developers, which makes our percentage of developers among users '''15%''', which is likely the highest figure any public MediaWiki installation can boost so that is an good incentative to try to adapt MediaWiki for our use over other wikis
----
<table>
<tr>
<th>MediaWiki</th><th>TikiWiki</th><th>MoinMoin</th>
</tr>
<td>
*Proven to perform well under heavy load
*Interaction between other systems the same software is needed
*Worked good for R&D purposes
*Dedicated developer community
*A very high ratio of developers (15% oof registered users) registered in [[consumerium]]
</td>
<td>
*Group management built-in
*Visualization of wiki-links
*Polls built in
</td>
<td>
*Good parser
*???
</td>
</tr>
</table>


----
----
9,842

edits

We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.