Talk:Guidelines for claiming corruption cases in Research Wiki: Difference between revisions
Talk:Guidelines for claiming corruption cases in Research Wiki (edit)
Revision as of 19:27, 9 September 2004
, 9 September 2004fix link
(usefulness) |
(fix link) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If human garbage that has actually made friends with [[Wikimedia]] will back off, these guidelines can be improved to being actually useful. The case of [[alleged Wikimedia corruption]] and involvement of [[Bomis]] in subverting any attempt to create an [[independent board]] is an excellent [[ | If human garbage that has actually made friends with [[Wikimedia]] will back off, these guidelines can be improved to being actually useful. The case of [[alleged Wikimedia corruption]] and involvement of [[Bomis]] in subverting any attempt to create an [[independent board]] is an excellent [[Consumerium Research pilot]] [[test case]], and when the [[Research Wiki]] exists, this case can be among the very first it deals with. Advantages of that include: | ||
*Expanding [[TIPAESA]] form to better model [[adversarial process]]es such as [[libel chill]] and [[perjury]] claims, which are going to be common in the actual operation of [[Consumerium Services]] (see [[Chief Editor]] especially) | *Expanding [[TIPAESA]] form to better model [[adversarial process]]es such as [[libel chill]] and [[perjury]] claims, which are going to be common in the actual operation of [[Consumerium Services]] (see [[Chief Editor]] especially) | ||