Jump to content

Talk:Attribution: Difference between revisions

people who violate licenses don't automatically have the right to demand that someone "work with them" to fix problems THEY created
(These are issues that should be taken up with the developers of MediaWiki)
(people who violate licenses don't automatically have the right to demand that someone "work with them" to fix problems THEY created)
 
Line 6: Line 6:


:::These are issues that should be taken up with the developers of [[MediaWiki]] --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 22:34, 18 Jun 2004 (EEST)
:::These are issues that should be taken up with the developers of [[MediaWiki]] --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 22:34, 18 Jun 2004 (EEST)
::::Lying little criminals like [[Erik Moeller]] and [[Tim Starling]] who hand out [[vandalbot]] code like party favours any time someone tells the truth about them?  Unlikely.  People who violate licenses don't automatically have the right to demand that someone "work with them" to fix problems THEY created - especially when some of the people involved are part of an [[echo chamber]] and [[libel pit]].
::::Legally, all [[Wikimedia]] deserves is a cease and desist order.  It is not up to someone who is disadvantaged by their [[GFDL violation]]s to go begging to their pet geeks.  [[Wikipedia]] is very clearly violating the [[GFDL]] on the [[attribution]] clause, and, other clauses.
Anonymous user
We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.