Talk:MySQL dump: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Talk:MySQL dump (edit)

Revision as of 14:42, 27 January 2004

157 bytes added , 27 January 2004

m

no edit summary

Jukeboksi

Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators

9,854

edits

Revision as of 22:51, 25 January 2004 (edit) 142.177.81.186 (talk) (no violation = no problem) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 14:42, 27 January 2004 (edit) (undo) Jukeboksi (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary
Line 4:		Line 4:

	::Double no trouble, since you weren't in violation. Technically, since you haven't banned any IP numbers, any reader can retrieve the source text just by clicking "edit this page". It would not be convenient to retrieve all of the texts that way, but, it probably would satisfy the GFDL. Whether it should or not, is another question. A bigger question is whether [[mediawiki]] sites can actually satisfy it at all, since their format can only be read by other mediawiki sites, i.e. there is no [[wikitext standard]] and mediawiki can't do an [[XML dump]]. So the effort required to create MySQL dumps might better be spent harassing the developers to make XML dumps work. They do in [[usemod]].		::Double no trouble, since you weren't in violation. Technically, since you haven't banned any IP numbers, any reader can retrieve the source text just by clicking "edit this page". It would not be convenient to retrieve all of the texts that way, but, it probably would satisfy the GFDL. Whether it should or not, is another question. A bigger question is whether [[mediawiki]] sites can actually satisfy it at all, since their format can only be read by other mediawiki sites, i.e. there is no [[wikitext standard]] and mediawiki can't do an [[XML dump]]. So the effort required to create MySQL dumps might better be spent harassing the developers to make XML dumps work. They do in [[usemod]].

			There was one homebrew spider that was badly parametrized so that it went into a loop causing useless hits. --[[User:Juxo\|Juxo]] 16:42, 27 Jan 2004 (EET)