Jump to content

Content Wiki: Difference between revisions

777 bytes added ,  4 October 2003
added notes about the relationship of ConsuML and Wiki information
(the need for templates for different article types)
(added notes about the relationship of ConsuML and Wiki information)
Line 6: Line 6:


This page is not for actual [[features|content]] but for developing the syntax and governance of the Content Wiki so we can set one up.
This page is not for actual [[features|content]] but for developing the syntax and governance of the Content Wiki so we can set one up.
----
----
==Wiki software==
==Wiki software==
Line 14: Line 13:
#MediaWiki modified
#MediaWiki modified
#A fork of MediaWiki
#A fork of MediaWiki
#Something else?


Which one of these alternatives makes sense is an open question
Which one of these alternatives makes sense is an open question
----
===The relationship between Wiki and [[ConsuML]] information===
*Data stored as [[ConsuML]] documents could be used to generate stubs into the wiki '''on-demand'''
*The parsing process goes the following way ConsuML data will be parsed to Wiki code in the appropriate natural language for each wiki, which then in turn will be parsed to HTML for the Consumer
*The autogenerated protions will be enclosed with special tags such as <nowiki><autogenerated></autogenerated></nowiki>
*Messing with the autogenerated portions manually better be justified
*The ConsuML will act as a glue between The Consumerium Exchange and the Content Wiki. ConsuML will be used to verify what corresponds to what within The Exchange and between The Exchange and The Wiki


----
----
==Wiki Syntax==
==Wiki Syntax==
If an modified version will be used it makes sense to use many more namespaces to make the wiki more manageable, but on the other hand using standard MediaWiki has many advantages. Using unmodified MediaWiki would just require stricter syntax within the articles
If a modified version will be used it makes sense to use many more namespaces to make the wiki more manageable, but on the other hand using standard MediaWiki has many advantages. Using unmodified MediaWiki would just require stricter syntax within the articles


According to MediaWiki developers adding numerous namespaces is easy so here is a brief and uncomplete list of likely namespaces:
According to MediaWiki developers adding numerous namespaces is easy so here is a brief and uncomplete list of likely namespaces:
Line 33: Line 41:
==Governance==
==Governance==
We need a summarum of the currently existing Wiki Governace Practices here and study each one and the resulting model that we will use will likely be a synthesis of numerous existing models
We need a summarum of the currently existing Wiki Governace Practices here and study each one and the resulting model that we will use will likely be a synthesis of numerous existing models
----
----


9,854

edits

We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.