Talk:142.177.X.X: Difference between revisions

Good morning 142.177.X.X
m (in fear of the "fork for greed")
(Good morning 142.177.X.X)
Line 46: Line 46:
#retain [[social capital]] (trust, relationships, connections) of all [[faction]]s as we try to achieve [[consensus]] on standards above.  No [[faction]] can feel so excluded that they go off to "start their own".
#retain [[social capital]] (trust, relationships, connections) of all [[faction]]s as we try to achieve [[consensus]] on standards above.  No [[faction]] can feel so excluded that they go off to "start their own".
::Actually they might try: I've been surfing around the net for small-to-medium businesses that focus on [[Bluetooth]] and I've seen lots of these "Imagine that you can push [[advertising]] material, electronic [[coupons]] etc. to your customers at the [[point-of-sale]]"-rantings, without any other goals then to further brainwash people wanting more things they don't actually need :(
::Actually they might try: I've been surfing around the net for small-to-medium businesses that focus on [[Bluetooth]] and I've seen lots of these "Imagine that you can push [[advertising]] material, electronic [[coupons]] etc. to your customers at the [[point-of-sale]]"-rantings, without any other goals then to further brainwash people wanting more things they don't actually need :(
----
Hello 142.177.X.X
It's been a "Link like hell day"... which is kinda silly since, we're a wiki, we don't need to link every other site linking to each other... we'll you know the phenomenon.
CHECK OUT: http://www.ethicalconsumer.org/research/corp_critic.htm but remember to come back. Their database has info on 28.000 [[companies]] and their sources are good. They charge <500/per annum for non-profits for "unlimited" access, with no rights to reproduce the data, but there is this clause in the legal stuff that says that we maybe could get a written agreement to incorporate their abundance of knowledge.
9,842

edits