Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators
9,856
edits
The Consumerium Exchange: Difference between revisions
I'm not sure if i'm using the right words since i'm not a native English speaker.
(brief introduction to the purpose of the exchange) |
(I'm not sure if i'm using the right words since i'm not a native English speaker.) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Perhaps every person gets two votes on each issue: | Perhaps every person gets two votes on each issue: | ||
*An indirect vote. This vote cannot be used directly, but | *An indirect vote. This vote cannot be used directly, but can be assigned to an '''registered''' not-for-profit organsation, that uses the voting power as decided by the governance of the organisation, thus rendering the identity of the vote holder anonymous. You may give your vote to only one organisation at a time. You may transfer it to an another organisation or just revoke it. The Burden of proof on the right to use a vote is mostly on the organisation in question. | ||
*An direct vote. This is perhaps a little unfair since people who don't have access to computer systems are likely unable to use their direct vote. | *An direct vote. This is perhaps a little unfair since people who don't have access to computer systems are likely unable to use their direct vote. Burden of proof on authentication is yet to be solved. | ||
Where issue is a disputed article or a campaign on a [[company]], [[product group]] or [[product]] | Where issue is a disputed article or a campaign on a [[company]], [[product group]] or [[product]] | ||
This permits several [[faction]]s to develop and align behind different views, and for those who choose a faction or a point of view defined by a faction on one issue, it permits [[buy or not]] decisions to be made clearly. Without this facility, there will be less "green light" and "red light" clarity, and more "yellow light" ambiguity. | This permits several [[faction]]s to develop and align behind different views, and for those who choose a faction or a point of view defined by a faction on one issue, it permits [[buy or not]] decisions to be made clearly. Without this facility, there will be less "green light" and "red light" clarity, and more "yellow light" ambiguity. | ||