Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators
9,856
edits
The Consumerium Exchange: Difference between revisions
clarify "direct" and "indirect" votes
(clarify what is an "issue") |
(clarify "direct" and "indirect" votes) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''Perhaps''' every person gets '''two votes''' on '''each issue''': | '''Perhaps''' every person gets '''two votes''' on '''each issue''': | ||
*An indirect vote. | |||
*An direct vote | *An indirect vote. This vote cannot be used directly, but must can be assigned to an '''registered''' not-for-profit organsation, that uses the voting power as decided by the governance of the organisation, thus rendering the identity of the vote holder anonymous. | ||
*An direct vote. This is perhaps a little unfair since people who don't have access to computer systems are likely unable to use their direct vote. | |||
Where issue is a disputed article or a campaign on a [[company]], [[product group]] or [[product]] | Where issue is a disputed article or a campaign on a [[company]], [[product group]] or [[product]] | ||
This permits several [[faction]]s to develop and align behind different views, and for those who choose a faction or a point of view defined by a faction on one issue, it permits [[buy or not]] decisions to be made clearly. Without this facility, there will be less "green light" and "red light" clarity, and more "yellow light" ambiguity. | This permits several [[faction]]s to develop and align behind different views, and for those who choose a faction or a point of view defined by a faction on one issue, it permits [[buy or not]] decisions to be made clearly. Without this facility, there will be less "green light" and "red light" clarity, and more "yellow light" ambiguity. | ||