Page history
25 June 2004
13 October 2003
9 October 2003
the cuts make this too abstract to be useful - restoring with better explanation, and acknowledging issues that we simply haven't resolved, and maybe can't resolve
+1,105
removing some of 142.177.X.X's edits for clarity
m−73
removing some of 142.177.X.X's edits for clarity
−549
8 October 2003
7 October 2003
5 October 2003
linking to the talk-page
m+105
extended FOAF-style peer review of participants
+858
more moving
m−136
moving the different types of votes to their own articles
m−1,472
4 October 2003
1 October 2003
reorganizing
m+67
Are you now or have you ever been an employee or owner of an company of any country doing subversive measures to The Consumerium Exchange???!
−127
oh why does everything have to be about lights of certain colour or the other or the other
m−203
fix non-sensical wording. how can products vote?
m−87
no betting please. there is already enough parties with vested interests to start manipulating the exchange
−1,491
three commitments?
+2,282
22 September 2003
anonymous or viewable direct votes? (Sorry for the crap English)
+129
minor reword
m+35
note on weak points
+90
partial solution to the burden of proof question regarding direct votes by dividing votes into distinct groups of trust
+628
21 September 2003
typo
m−1
indirect votes can be assigned only to organisations where you are a member?
+145
excluding votes should also be possible
+75
moving some irrelevant stuff to the talk page
m−344
I'm not sure if i'm using the right words since i'm not a native English speaker.
+266
brief introduction to the purpose of the exchange
+331
clarify "direct" and "indirect" votes
+381
clarify what is an "issue"
+122
two votes per person per issue?
+89
clarify what is valuated in the exchange
−61