XML/DTD: Difference between revisions

625 bytes added ,  15 April 2003
m
I still oppose m:person_DTD and can say with confidence that even more mellow stuff has been shot down by Wikitech Gurus
m (formatting)
m (I still oppose m:person_DTD and can say with confidence that even more mellow stuff has been shot down by Wikitech Gurus)
Line 15: Line 15:
*[[m:spacetime_DTD]] (This is necessary for automatic relation mapping and borders of )
*[[m:spacetime_DTD]] (This is necessary for automatic relation mapping and borders of )
Spacetime is critical to match suppliers and buyers of non-offensive goods in space and time, without which, buyers may have no choice but to buy offensive goods.  It is critical also to identifying borders of natural ecoregions as they exist or as they are degraded over time.  This is useful to graphically show the impacts e.g. of [[w:deforestation]].
Spacetime is critical to match suppliers and buyers of non-offensive goods in space and time, without which, buyers may have no choice but to buy offensive goods.  It is critical also to identifying borders of natural ecoregions as they exist or as they are degraded over time.  This is useful to graphically show the impacts e.g. of [[w:deforestation]].


*[[m:ecoregion_DTD]] (This is a great idea and has to be implemented in [[Cium]])  
*[[m:ecoregion_DTD]] (This is a great idea and has to be implemented in [[Cium]])  
Line 21: Line 20:


===persons ===
===persons ===
*[[m:person_DTD]] (controversial to [[w:wikipedians]], less so for [http://disinfopedia.org disinfopedians] and some [[NGO]]s - overkill for cium?)
*[[m:person_DTD]]  
 
: This type of control-freakish markup is shunned by many [[w:wikipedians|wikipedians]] for understandable reasons, where as [http://disinfopedia.org disinfopedians] and some [[w:NGO|NGO]]s like it.
 
: As for what I think is that this is way overkill for our purposes. [[Gender]], [[Birthyear]], [[Nationality]], [[Employer]], [[Profession]] and perhaps some contact info should be quite adequate for [[employee]]s, [[campaigner]]s and [[commentator]]s. [[w:Anonymous Coward|Anonymous Coward]]s can of course be dismissed as nobodys more easily then someone who has [[w:GnuPG|GnuPG]] or commercially signed identities.  [[Consumer]]s naturally can reveal as little or much about themselves as they wish. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 23:21 Apr 15, 2003 (EEST)


Identifying individual people unambiguously is more controversial, a two-edged sword.  Some activists like [http://amnesty.org Amnesty] and [http://greenpeace.org Greenpeace] do it often, for what they consider clear moral purposes.  Other projects like [http://wikipedia.org Wikipedia] have less clear purposes and thus less excuse for "outing" or "shaming".  This is not an easy issue for consumerium:   
Identifying individual people unambiguously is more controversial, a two-edged sword.  Some activists like [http://amnesty.org Amnesty] and [http://greenpeace.org Greenpeace] do it often, for what they consider clear moral purposes.  Other projects like [http://wikipedia.org Wikipedia] have less clear purposes and thus less excuse for "outing" or "shaming".  This is not an easy issue for consumerium:   
9,842

edits