User:Jukeboksi/Blog/June2004: Difference between revisions

m
no. not getwiki
(bottom line? GetWiki remains champion despite its bugs, for XML import feature)
m (no. not getwiki)
Line 1: Line 1:
----
15.6.2004
15.6.2004


Line 4: Line 5:


::Right.  The [[GetWiki]] way is the correct way:  direct to another web address and tranparently mirror the material as is, including all changes, until there is a need to fork just that one page.  However there are ideological reasons and [[Wikimedia corruption]] reasons why you will not ever get the [[MediaWiki]] coders to do that.
::Right.  The [[GetWiki]] way is the correct way:  direct to another web address and tranparently mirror the material as is, including all changes, until there is a need to fork just that one page.  However there are ideological reasons and [[Wikimedia corruption]] reasons why you will not ever get the [[MediaWiki]] coders to do that.
:::No. The right way is to recruit PHP coders to make an import feature that works for us. I know very little PHP, I can hardly read the SpecialImport.php that contains the code for the Import feature.


*What we would need is a myriad of wikis with radiobuttons to choose from which wiki to import and do it live, not manually saving and uploading the file.
*What we would need is a myriad of wikis with radiobuttons to choose from which wiki to import and do it live, not manually saving and uploading the file.
9,842

edits