Under debate: Difference between revisions
preen
mNo edit summary |
(preen) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Sorry. This is propably impossible for anyone else then [[User:Juxo|me]] and [[142.177.X.X]] to follow this rambling. But no stress, go to [[Identifying people]] to see what we've battled out so far.''' | |||
''actually, some are still in the process of wondering what DTD means and implies...'' | |||
And a real-live-person DTD is critical to ensure that anyone who participates in an '''extremely offensive''' production process | And a real-live-person DTD is critical to ensure that anyone who participates in an '''extremely offensive''' production process | ||
| Line 41: | Line 45: | ||
You cannot take bad people and make them good people by negotiation or force. Once a company exists its DNA is set, it can only be replaced not "fixed". Like any other lower animal... | You cannot take bad people and make them good people by negotiation or force. Once a company exists its DNA is set, it can only be replaced not "fixed". Like any other lower animal... | ||
#) Start an [[ | #) Start an [[endorsement]] on it's companies providing replacement products for the evil company's products | ||
:Here there is room for negotiation. And more complex transaction than just "don't buy", it could be a number (of cents more you pay for a tolerable product), or it could actually direct you to anothe product that is a best price/morality tradeoff. Then you are talking about more than a binary destroy/not outcome. | :Here there is room for negotiation. And more complex transaction than just "don't buy", it could be a number (of cents more you pay for a tolerable product), or it could actually direct you to anothe product that is a best price/morality tradeoff. Then you are talking about more than a binary destroy/not outcome. | ||
:: and the [[Hardware Requirements|infrastructure]] to transport their information to [[consumer]]s. Then it's up to the [[consumer]]s to [[feedback|communicate]] their feelings to producers with [[words or wallets]] or both. | :: and the [[Hardware Requirements|infrastructure]] to transport their information to [[consumer]]s. Then it's up to the [[consumer]]s to [[feedback|communicate]] their feelings to producers with [[words or wallets]] or both. | ||
:::Still requires my personal morality, idea of "evil", to be expressed in [[XML]] so that things I consider evil can turn on | :::Still requires my personal morality, idea of "evil", to be expressed in [[XML]] so that things I consider evil can turn on [[green light]] or [[red light]] on the shelf. The fact that I considered but did not buy from that seller can be communicated directly, or later with details, or never. Up to me. But I am not reading or writing an essay for every single purchase. I want to pre-load preferences and never see things that don't satisfy requirements online, and on the shelf, I want just the "OK/not" (i.e. "buyable/EVIL") signal. | ||
::::Well. Either you have to choose some [[authority]] you [[trust]] (let me take a wild guess: Greenpeace) and let them decide on this matter or you can browse all available information and make decisions yourself. | ::::Well. Either you have to choose some [[authority]] you [[trust]] (let me take a wild guess: Greenpeace) and let them decide on this matter or you can browse all available information and make decisions yourself. | ||
| Line 71: | Line 75: | ||
::I counted one full minute (60 seconds), and then came here to tell you. | ::I counted one full minute (60 seconds), and then came here to tell you. | ||
:::I counted one full month, then more, but forget to tell you. Time to start linking stuff to it! It is really quite good (troll preens). | |||
Other Trolls are also invited to attempt the above. | Other Trolls are also invited to attempt the above. | ||