Troll Board: Difference between revisions

68 bytes removed ,  23 October 2012
rm spam
No edit summary
(rm spam)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''Troll Board''' is like a parole board (even kind of sounds like it) that decides which trolls are indefensible due to [[libel]], [[outing]], difficult-to-define [[vandalism]] or whatever they might do.  Note that [[sysop]]s count as [[trolls]] too under this definition*, so where a Troll Board exists, sysops can be bounced.  Recruitment to this board is probably based on whoever has been most obviously oppressed by [[sysop power structure]], [[libel]], [[outing]], etc..
A '''Troll Board''' is like a parole board (even kind of sounds like it) that decides which trolls are indefensible due to [[libel]], [[outing]], difficult-to-define [[vandalism]] or whatever they might do.  Note that [[sysop]]s count as [[trolls]] too under this definition*, so where a Troll Board exists, sysops can be bounced.  Recruitment to this board is probably based on whoever has been most obviously oppressed by [[sysop power structure]], [[libel]], [[outing]], etc..


A Troll Board usually comes into existence when a [[Lowest Troll]] goes insane and starts to build a [[sysop power structure]] accountable only to themselves, consort with [[GodKing]]s, or be cowed by [[libel chill]] or the invention of [[spun threat]]s for which they might be "held responsible" - even though they did not occur. [http://dissertations.biz/thesis.php dissertations writing service] Once such corporate intimidation, e.g. from Bomis, begins, it is difficult to imagine that it would not lead to other such intimidation, e.g. from [[Monsanto]], [[McDonald's]], [[Exxon]], [[Coca-Cola]] and others who are good at frightening those critical of their [[worst practices]].
A Troll Board usually comes into existence when a [[Lowest Troll]] goes insane and starts to build a [[sysop power structure]] accountable only to themselves, consort with [[GodKing]]s, or be cowed by [[libel chill]] or the invention of [[spun threat]]s for which they might be "held responsible" - even though they did not occur. Once such corporate intimidation, e.g. from Bomis, begins, it is difficult to imagine that it would not lead to other such intimidation, e.g. from [[Monsanto]], [[McDonald's]], [[Exxon]], [[Coca-Cola]] and others who are good at frightening those critical of their [[worst practices]].


Such a board would still be responsible to [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] where delivery of [[Consumerium Services]] are concerned.
Such a board would still be responsible to [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] where delivery of [[Consumerium Services]] are concerned.
9,842

edits