Talk:XML/DTD: Difference between revisions
Issue can be elaborated structure, Evil must be personal, recommendation must be signalled conveniently, many options for producer notification
(See bottom. I'm not going to want to explain this a million times.) |
(Issue can be elaborated structure, Evil must be personal, recommendation must be signalled conveniently, many options for producer notification) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
:this requires [[EvilML]] | :this requires [[EvilML]] | ||
::No it doesn't. It requires well known [[commentator]]s, and [[campaigner]]s that stick more-or-less with [[m:TIPAESA]] principles and the [[Hardware Requirements|infrastructure]] to transport their information to [[consumer]]s. Then it's up to the [[consumer]]s to [[feedback|communicate]] their feelings to producers with [[words or wallets]] or both. | ::No it doesn't. It requires well known [[commentator]]s, and [[campaigner]]s that stick more-or-less with [[m:TIPAESA]] principles | ||
:::Yes but... (also realize that "Issue" can be expanded into say Ecoregion/HarmBeingDone/ActivityDoingThatHarm" and then Position taken on how to end it - so "I" can expand)... and more important how we use the information: | |||
:: and the [[Hardware Requirements|infrastructure]] to transport their information to [[consumer]]s. Then it's up to the [[consumer]]s to [[feedback|communicate]] their feelings to producers with [[words or wallets]] or both. | |||
:::Still requires my personal morality, idea of "evil", to be expressed in [[EvilML]] so that things I consider evil can turn on "green light" or "red light" on the shelf. The fact that I considered but did not buy from that seller can be communicated directly, or later with details, or never. Up to me. But I am not reading or writing an essay for every single purchase. I want to pre-load preferences and never see things that don't satisfy requirements online, and on the shelf, I want just the "OK/not" (i.e. "buyable/EVIL") signal. | |||