Jump to content

Talk:Service cycle: Difference between revisions

Develop->Research->Publish->Signal->Feedback->Develop
m (Awww. Gimme a break with this audio...)
(Develop->Research->Publish->Signal->Feedback->Develop)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:
:::Awww. Gimme a break with this audio. We are living in such a '''signal infested''' world that I really don't want any audio widgets to guide shopping.
:::Awww. Gimme a break with this audio. We are living in such a '''signal infested''' world that I really don't want any audio widgets to guide shopping.


::::It doesn't matter what YOU want.  Perhaps uncomfortable signals or just encouraging words have the psychological impact whether you want it or not, and failure is inevitable until they are there.  But if it matters what you awnt, it matters also what [[DanKeshet]] wants, and he wants [[print]].  So we have one advocate each for [[audio]], [[video]], and [[Paper Consumerium]].  But [[audio]] has the [[speed]] edge.  And that's going to be the most critical of all [[performance requirements]].  Which is exactly why you deleted that file, we trolls suspect.  It's a typical form of [[sysop]] power abuse, which is, delete the requirements you know you can't meet.  It's done even in big hardware companies!  Usually this only destroys companies.  But the [[Lowest Troll]] should be more careful, as it might in this case destroy rainforests. 


and only then what [[Consumerium Process]] is.   
and only then what [[Consumerium Process]] is.   


:The whole management ([[govenance]]) issue boils down to "What is the [[Consumerium Process]]".
:The whole management ([[govenance]]) issue boils down to "What is the [[Consumerium Process]]".
:::Neatly stated as "Develop->Research->Publish->Signal->Feedback->Develop" [[service cycle]] of [[Consumerium:Itself]].


Since the services are what we want to represent, and the access must happen as decisions are made about the services, and then the process is trying to keep those decisions up to date with current assertions about the services, it seems we probably have to go in that order.
Since the services are what we want to represent, and the access must happen as decisions are made about the services, and then the process is trying to keep those decisions up to date with current assertions about the services, it seems we probably have to go in that order.


:see above about [[Checkout Consumerium]]: '''buy, examine, re-evaluate, buy different''' --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 15:03, 16 Mar 2004 (EET)
:see above about [[Checkout Consumerium]]: '''buy, examine, re-evaluate, buy different''' --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 15:03, 16 Mar 2004 (EET)
Anonymous user
We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.