Talk:RFID: Difference between revisions

325 bytes removed ,  8 March 2004
m
removing off-topic
No edit summary
m (removing off-topic)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
In [[Germany]] Metro Group has chosen to replace 10.000 [[RFID]] enabled [[frequent buyer card]]s with conventional ones because [[consumer]]s were concerned about the possibility that the RFID-cards could be used to track them in-store
In [[Germany]] Metro Group has chosen to replace 10.000 [[RFID]] enabled [[frequent buyer card]]s with conventional ones because [[consumer]]s were concerned about the possibility that the RFID-cards could be used to track them in-store


:Maybe this is an argument for [[friendly retail]] which people would actually trust to know more about them?  what if [[Big Carrot]] customers did trust the store, but ordinary [[supermarket]]s were not trusted?  If so then there might be a technology advantage as well as a direct cooperation advantage.
:Maybe this is an argument for [[friendly retail]] which people would actually trust to know more about them?  what if [[Big Carrot]] customers did trust the store, but ordinary [[supermarket]]s were not trusted?  If so then there might be a technology advantage as well as a direct cooperation advantage, to working with our friends.
 
----
Yeah. Lets do UWB or Ultra Wide Band next. I have this understanding that it doesn't have a carrier wave making it nearly impossible to detect it's activity or non-activity by conventional means, which is scary.
 
:Yeesh.  Why not just [[barcode]] all the humans?  There is probably space on my neck beside the tattoo of a loathsome [[troll]].
9,842

edits