33
edits
Talk:Ontological distinction(24): Difference between revisions
refactor
MattisManzel (talk | contribs) (Hugh.) |
(refactor) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
[[English Wikipedia User 24]] seemed to imply that corruption arises from mistaking operational for ontological distinctions, creating simple [[groupthink]]. That is probably optimistic though. There are other theories: it might be lack of [[due process]], or over-tolerance for [[systemic bias]]-approved POVs (like [[English Wikipedia User RK]]), or under-tolerance of [[New Troll point of view]] (like [[English Wikipedia User JRR_Trollkien]]). According to [[Wikipedia Red Faction]], it is plain and simple political hate, played out in [[politics as usual]]. Probably all these theories have some merits. Some imply conspiracy, and others, mere idiocy: | [[English Wikipedia User 24]] seemed to imply that corruption arises from mistaking operational for ontological distinctions, creating simple [[groupthink]]. That is probably optimistic though. There are other theories: it might be lack of [[due process]], or over-tolerance for [[systemic bias]]-approved POVs (like [[English Wikipedia User RK]]), or under-tolerance of [[New Troll point of view]] (like [[English Wikipedia User JRR_Trollkien]]). According to [[Wikipedia Red Faction]], it is plain and simple political hate, played out in [[politics as usual]]. Probably all these theories have some merits. Some imply conspiracy, and others, mere idiocy: | ||
It does not take more than a few encounters with a drooling | It does not take more than a few encounters with a drooling retards, autistic robots, or a [[technological escalation|nuclear weapon builder]], or a gibbering control freak to realize that they're the kind of people no one actually wants to know, who seek substitute social lives via power in a wiki. The problem is, how to flush them from the system? By [[lawsuit]]s that specifically cite their errors and crimes? By less formal complaints that make others realize systems are more effective without them, than with them? Or what? | ||
By grooving. By forgetting about those who pissed on your tie and by shaping something. By stopping to complain in whatever form about whatever that is but make something new from scratch and take resposibility for it, sysop-status included. By saying who you are instead of repeating what you think without listening. Noone can listen to what you think as you have no face. Without a face there is no mouth neither, and a mouth is essential for human communication. You are as ineffective as a bicycle in Venice. A pitty this is, a fucking waste. It's sad, much more sad for you than for me. But it's sad for me too. Do you realize that this sadness is the only thing we have in common after the days of communicate interaction between us? Do you know, do you remember that there are other feelings than your sadness? Try to please and then learn to use your face and your mouth. You'll be surprised, I promise ;) Ciao -- [[User:MattisManzel|MattisManzel]] 09:44, 5 Jul 2004 (EEST) | By grooving. By forgetting about those who pissed on your tie and by shaping something. By stopping to complain in whatever form about whatever that is but make something new from scratch and take resposibility for it, sysop-status included. By saying who you are instead of repeating what you think without listening. Noone can listen to what you think as you have no face. Without a face there is no mouth neither, and a mouth is essential for human communication. You are as ineffective as a bicycle in Venice. A pitty this is, a fucking waste. It's sad, much more sad for you than for me. But it's sad for me too. Do you realize that this sadness is the only thing we have in common after the days of communicate interaction between us? Do you know, do you remember that there are other feelings than your sadness? Try to please and then learn to use your face and your mouth. You'll be surprised, I promise ;) Ciao -- [[User:MattisManzel|MattisManzel]] 09:44, 5 Jul 2004 (EEST) | ||