32
edits
Talk:Ontological distinction(24): Difference between revisions
Hugh.
(bah; 24 was wrong, corruption is not a mistake, it is in the soul of the sysop itself; the sadness is that they exist at all) |
MattisManzel (talk | contribs) (Hugh.) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:Hail the [[Wikipedia Red Faction|red faction]]! Victory to the [[Wikipedia Red Faction|red faction]]! And great sadness to the [[sysop power structure]]. | :Hail the [[Wikipedia Red Faction|red faction]]! Victory to the [[Wikipedia Red Faction|red faction]]! And great sadness to the [[sysop power structure]]. | ||
Well thanks for the interesting communication. It was dryish, not funny at all, but very interesting nevertheless. We both explained out viewpoint with emphasis, that's good. We both gave a short time for trying to convince oneanother of the other viewpoint and we both recognized it by doing so, that's good. We agree that we are essential to each other, that's good. So let's just work on on the common thing called world-tree, may the result be a satisfying one. Hugh. [[User:MattisManzel|MattisManzel]] 22:52, 5 Jul 2004 (EEST) | |||