Talk:MediaWiki modifications: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(true, TikiWiki has some advantages and out-of-the-box features that we need) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Given that the features you want are mostly in [[tikiwiki]], why not just use that? It would be easier to support a common [[wikitext standard]] in that more supported software, than try to make mediawiki do what it doesn't do well. | Given that the features you want are mostly in [[tikiwiki]], why not just use that? It would be easier to support a common [[wikitext standard]] in that more supported software, than try to make mediawiki do what it doesn't do well. | ||
:I'm looking into it. The new version 1.8 or Polaris seems much more responsive then the 1.4 and 1.5 i fooled around with when trying to locate a CMS to do this concept development & research stuff. | |||
*It does do valid XHTML which is an advantage over | |||
*The linkage visualization (map) thing seems very interesting | |||
*It does have group management already, but according to my knowledge adding this to MediaWiki isn't a problem at all. | |||
:more on this debate MediWiki vs. Other Wiki Implementations later on. Maybe we should commit an article to this issue.[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] | |||
[[MoinMoinWiki]] is even more extensible with a GREAT parser and extension system. | [[MoinMoinWiki]] is even more extensible with a GREAT parser and extension system. | ||