Talk:Intershop comparison: Difference between revisions

anwsers to 142.177.X.X
(points to address before changing this again)
 
(anwsers to 142.177.X.X)
Line 2: Line 2:


1. how, exactly, is one to prevent [[intershop comparison]] from being provided by an add-on service?  What [[Consumerium License]] provisions specifically say "you can't do this, and we can yank your access to the data if you do"?
1. how, exactly, is one to prevent [[intershop comparison]] from being provided by an add-on service?  What [[Consumerium License]] provisions specifically say "you can't do this, and we can yank your access to the data if you do"?
:<pre>Including explicit price data in your submissions is explicitly forbidden in [[Consumerium]].
Any such data will be removed if found in [[Research Wiki]] or [[Signal Wiki]]
You may include verbal descriptions of pricing policies of different companies,
but no numerical data whether as in price or percentage will be allowed</pre> --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 16:59, 13 Mar 2004 (EET)


2. why, exactly, does the [[Development Wiki]]'s present concept of [[Features]] and their priority take precedence over what is required to implement [[best cases]]?  A proper development process is motivated by its [[comprehensive outcome]] as expressed in [[use case]]s.
2. why, exactly, does the [[Development Wiki]]'s present concept of [[Features]] and their priority take precedence over what is required to implement [[best cases]]?  A proper development process is motivated by its [[comprehensive outcome]] as expressed in [[use case]]s.
:I haven't looked at the [[best cases]] in a while and when i did i found them to be quite [[utopia]]n (exept for those that were [[dystopia]]n) and to the anwser as to why there will be no explicit price data is to
::A) No retailer, not even [[friendly retail]]er will want their price information to be licensed for any use that is not explicitly hoped and paid for by the retailer ie. [[advertising]]
::B) Including price data within the [[Wikis]] would gepardise our assumed neutrality.
::C) Keeping the price data exact and up-to-date would take too much resources


3. If you have big problems or anticipate big problems with [[intershop comparison]], why is there nothing in [[worst cases]] explaining how it has bad consequences?  Until there is, objections to this feature HAVE NO STATUS, and amount to nothing but feelings.  This is similar to the [[betting]] issue.  If you can't explain why it's bad, expect others to pursue it, until you can.  If you're building an open architecture, you're going to see services you don't want implemented, implemented.
3. If you have big problems or anticipate big problems with [[intershop comparison]], why is there nothing in [[worst cases]] explaining how it has bad consequences?  Until there is, objections to this feature HAVE NO STATUS, and amount to nothing but feelings.  This is similar to the [[betting]] issue.  If you can't explain why it's bad, expect others to pursue it, until you can.  If you're building an open architecture, you're going to see services you don't want implemented, implemented.
:We are likely to run into possibly bad attitudes in implementing [[Intershop navigation]], since some retailers will be afraid that the feature is driving customers to competing businesses. besides if you look at [[features]] it says that the implementation medium for [[Intershop navigation]] is yet undetermined since it requires some kind of [[GIS]]-engine to run such a service, which undoubtably would be useful.


4. Consider whether your view is [[faction]]al.  To many people, price comparison is the first feature they'd want, and only later would they care about [[moral purchasing]].
4. Consider whether your view is [[faction]]al.  To many people, price comparison is the first feature they'd want, and only later would they care about [[moral purchasing]].
:The ones looking primarily for price comparison can go elsewhere. The internet is full of [[price comparison]]-services
9,842

edits