Talk:Faction tag: Difference between revisions

1,945 bytes added ,  24 July 2004
factional talk from #Wikipedia
(problem is we need a power structure and all models so far are flawed, or are they)
(factional talk from #Wikipedia)
 
Line 2: Line 2:


Once again we run into the age-old problem of requiring a [[power structure]] without wanting one because all new power structures are always based on earlier power structures finally leading to people flaming the [[Lowest Troll]] to be a Despot, Dictator, Fascist, [[Sysop]] or [[GodKing]] with [[God's Eye View]].
Once again we run into the age-old problem of requiring a [[power structure]] without wanting one because all new power structures are always based on earlier power structures finally leading to people flaming the [[Lowest Troll]] to be a Despot, Dictator, Fascist, [[Sysop]] or [[GodKing]] with [[God's Eye View]].
--------
''This stuff from [[Meta-Wikipedia]]'s list of IRC quotes seems relevant to the question of tagging for [[faction]]:''
<juxho> here are the basic assumptions i'm relying on: there
        will be [[opinion wiki]] where strict syntax will be
        required to get aggregate information to [[publish wiki]],
        non-neutral-pov is the rule. there will be research
        wiki where all non-neutral-pov stuff will get axed
        immediatelly with a kind notice to go mess around in the
        [[opinion wiki]]. [[publish wiki]] will import from
        [[research wiki]] pending that someone will bet their own
        credibility in declaring some information so certain that
        it needs to be published. also aggregated (via SQL scripts
        written in a not-yet-decided language) will be used to
        automatically update the articles in [[publish wiki]] with
        the aggregate information from [[opinion wiki]] with
        highlights and links to the whole mess of opinions
        * juxho gone to drink more beer
%
  <nsh> I'm currently putting off over 200 individually important tasks
<Grunt`> nsh: how many of them involve putting off work? ;)
  <nsh> Grunt`, most of them, but that's the beauty of it
%
<clarknova> water isn't cheap at all. it comes at a tremendous
            hidden cost.
  <Raul654> It falls from the sky, for free!
%
* Kurt__ goes back to planning his capitalist revolution
* blankfaze goes back to planning his libertarian revolution
* iostream goes back to planning his opensource revolution
* Grunt` goes back to planning his revolution revolution
* morwen goes back to planning her punk rock revolution
* AdamBishop goes back to revolving around the sun
-----------
How sad that [[Juxo]] discusses this stuff with the [[groupthink]]ers, but not here first!!!  Why not ask intelligent people from all these factions over here?
Anonymous user