Split: Difference between revisions
(Campaign split can occour if people who are stakeholders in the campaign have a serious disagreement on the [[campaign]) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Split is a [[feature]] of an [[campaign]]''' | |||
[[Campaign]] [[split]] can occour if people who are [[stakeholder]]s in the campaign have a serious disagreement on the [[campaign]] and a specified majority [[vote]] to split it. Splitting of course makes the resulting campaigns smaller and therefore less visible. | [[Campaign]] [[split]] can occour if people who are [[stakeholder]]s in the campaign have a serious disagreement on the [[campaign]] and a specified majority [[vote]] to split it. Splitting of course makes the resulting campaigns smaller and therefore less visible. | ||
An example situation could be where company X has had some bad practice in the past and then drops that practice. A [[boycott]] might split to an [[endorsment]] and [[boycott]] as a result that some people feel that the company should still be boycotted because of past bad corporate citezenship and some people feel that it should be endorsed to support it's new direction. | An example situation could be where company X has had some bad practice in the past and then drops that practice. A [[boycott]] might split to an [[endorsment]] and [[boycott]] as a result that some people feel that the company should still be boycotted because of past bad corporate citezenship and some people feel that it should be endorsed to support it's new direction. | ||
Revision as of 17:44, 14 April 2003
Split is a feature of an campaign
Campaign split can occour if people who are stakeholders in the campaign have a serious disagreement on the campaign and a specified majority vote to split it. Splitting of course makes the resulting campaigns smaller and therefore less visible.
An example situation could be where company X has had some bad practice in the past and then drops that practice. A boycott might split to an endorsment and boycott as a result that some people feel that the company should still be boycotted because of past bad corporate citezenship and some people feel that it should be endorsed to support it's new direction.