MediaWiki modifications: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    (link to meta for more info on MediaWiki-namespace)
    (spelling, a few notes - similar page needed for all the other wiki code - mediawiki is very far behind some of them, e.g. tikiwiki which does most of this now)
    Line 1: Line 1:
    This page is for discussing and defining the modifications/patches that we need to make to the MediaWiki software to enable running [[Content Wiki]] and [[Opinion Wiki]]
    This page is for discussing and defining the modifications/patches that we need to make to the MediaWiki software to enable running [[Content Wiki]] and [[Opinion Wiki]].  A similar page exists for each other [[wiki code]] option.


    ==MediaWiki-namespace==
    ==MediaWiki-namespace==
    Line 9: Line 9:
    For [[Content Wiki]] to be managed well we need to have at least the following namespaces:
    For [[Content Wiki]] to be managed well we need to have at least the following namespaces:
    *Product
    *Product
    *ProductGroup  
    *ProductGroup - what is this?
    *Company
    *Company
    *[[faction]] and tendency (describing one's own biases/assumptions)


    For the [[Opinion Wiki]] we need at least the following namespaces:
    For the [[Opinion Wiki]] we need at least the following namespaces:
    *Group
    *Group
    *VirtualGroup
    *VirtualGroup - what is this?
    *Campaign
    *[[Campaign]]
    ----
    ----
    ==Article signing==
    ==Article signing==
    The software has to be extended to enable organisations and individuals to sign any version of any article in the [[Content Wiki]] with GnuPG or other keys. This is essential to maintain the integrity of the recorded information. Some people may want to see the live wiki, understanding the possible hazards in it, but most will likely want some level of assurance from authorative parties on the correctness of the information
    The software has to be extended to enable organisations and individuals to sign any version of any article in the [[Content Wiki]] with GnuPG or other keys. This is essential to maintain the [[integrity]] of the recorded information. Some people may want to see the live wiki, understanding the possible hazards in it, but most will likely want some level of assurance from authorative parties on the correctness of the information
    ----
    ----
    ==Content autogenration==
    ==Content autogeneration==
    We need to have a module for generating and identifying information coming from the [[Consumerium Vault]], wherein information is verified by staff. Also reacting to editing of autogenrated content (if made possible) has to be dealt with.
    We need to have a module for generating and identifying information coming from the [[Consumerium Vault]], wherein information is verified by staff. Also reacting to editing of autogenrated content (if made possible) has to be dealt with.
    ----
    ----
    Line 26: Line 27:
    For  [[Opinion Wiki]] we need to restrict the creation of [[Group]]-articles to only those entities that are registered in and verified by the [[Vault]]
    For  [[Opinion Wiki]] we need to restrict the creation of [[Group]]-articles to only those entities that are registered in and verified by the [[Vault]]
    ----
    ----
    ==Privilige management==
    ==Privelege management==
    For [[Opinion Wiki]] we need totally new code to manage the addition, modification and removal of usergroups
    For [[Opinion Wiki]] we need totally new code to manage the addition, modification and removal of usergroups who can be granted arbitrary priveleges (at present there is only 'developer', 'sysop' and 'blocked IP' status)
    ----
    ---
    ==Editing restrictions==
    ==Editing restrictions==
    For the [[Opinion Wiki]] we need to manage restriction of editing of certain articles and subarticles to certain users belonging to designed usergroups
    For the [[Opinion Wiki]] we need to manage restriction of editing of certain articles and subarticles to certain users belonging to designed usergroups OR alternatively require their editorial approval before an edit is visible.
     
    ----
    ----
    ==Middleware connection with Opinion Wiki edits==
    ==Middleware connection with Opinion Wiki edits==
    Edits to the [[Opinion Wiki]] have to be screened by middleware software to update the composite view of the wiki eg. changes in [[vote]]s or [[score]]s
    Edits to the [[Opinion Wiki]] have to be screened by middleware software to update the composite view of the wiki eg. changes in [[vote]]s or [[score]]s

    Revision as of 03:31, 7 February 2004

    This page is for discussing and defining the modifications/patches that we need to make to the MediaWiki software to enable running Content Wiki and Opinion Wiki. A similar page exists for each other wiki code option.

    MediaWiki-namespace

    This is a new feature in MediaWiki. It is a namespace for storing and accessing large number of short items quickly. All [[MediaWiki:]] entries are stored in RAM and can be modified on the fly by sysops. MediaWiki-namespace items have the possibility to use variable-subsitution which is really useful for displaying campaign stats in Opinion Wiki articles among other things.

    For further information on this: m:Meta-Wikimedia:MediaWiki namespace

    Added namespaces

    For Content Wiki to be managed well we need to have at least the following namespaces:

    • Product
    • ProductGroup - what is this?
    • Company
    • faction and tendency (describing one's own biases/assumptions)

    For the Opinion Wiki we need at least the following namespaces:

    • Group
    • VirtualGroup - what is this?
    • Campaign

    Article signing

    The software has to be extended to enable organisations and individuals to sign any version of any article in the Content Wiki with GnuPG or other keys. This is essential to maintain the integrity of the recorded information. Some people may want to see the live wiki, understanding the possible hazards in it, but most will likely want some level of assurance from authorative parties on the correctness of the information


    Content autogeneration

    We need to have a module for generating and identifying information coming from the Consumerium Vault, wherein information is verified by staff. Also reacting to editing of autogenrated content (if made possible) has to be dealt with.


    Article creation restrictions

    For Opinion Wiki we need to restrict the creation of Group-articles to only those entities that are registered in and verified by the Vault


    Privelege management

    For Opinion Wiki we need totally new code to manage the addition, modification and removal of usergroups who can be granted arbitrary priveleges (at present there is only 'developer', 'sysop' and 'blocked IP' status) ---

    Editing restrictions

    For the Opinion Wiki we need to manage restriction of editing of certain articles and subarticles to certain users belonging to designed usergroups OR alternatively require their editorial approval before an edit is visible.


    Middleware connection with Opinion Wiki edits

    Edits to the Opinion Wiki have to be screened by middleware software to update the composite view of the wiki eg. changes in votes or scores