International trade: Difference between revisions
(defining scope) |
m (typos) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Also [[blues|pro-globalization]] people may be very strong advocates of [[w:protectionism]] when it comes to [[product group]]s that are seen as traditionally nationally important. | Also [[blues|pro-globalization]] people may be very strong advocates of [[w:protectionism]] when it comes to [[product group]]s that are seen as traditionally nationally important. | ||
Many [[greens|ecologists]] | Many [[greens|ecologists]] object to international trade on grounds that transportation of [[product]]s over long distances is not ecologically sane. | ||
There is also the [[reds|opposition]] based on distress caused to the local economical situation due to the fact that [[Multinational]] [[corporation]]s can move their production and [[capital]] around the globe quite quickly and use this possibility to negotiate or extort [[tax]] exemptions in countries that fear loss of [[employment]] | There is also the [[reds|opposition]] based on distress caused to the local economical situation due to the fact that [[Multinational]] [[corporation]]s can move their production and [[capital]] around the globe quite quickly and use this possibility to negotiate or extort [[tax]] exemptions in countries that fear the loss of [[employment]] | ||
For the [[consumer]] international trade provides more [[moral choice|choice]] and reduced [[price]]s from increased competition. | For the [[consumer]] international trade provides more [[moral choice|choice]] and reduced [[price]]s from increased competition. | ||